OFFICIAL SWEEPSTAKES RULES: 2019-2020 Travel Oregon Email Newsletter Sweepstakes Sponsor: Oregon Tourism Commission (dba Travel Oregon), 319 SW Washington St, Suite 700 Portland, OR 97204 1. HERE’S HOW TO ENTER: To be eligible for the drawing, entrants must complete a two-step process: 1. Submit your email address by signing up for any Travel Oregon email newsletter on any Travel Oregon email newsletter form and then 2. Confirm your subscription by clicking on the link you receive in your email. Entries must be received by deadline of sweepstakes (11:59:59pm, PST on April 15, 2020). In compliance with the Americans with Disabilities Act, alternate entry procedures and entry materials in alternate formats, such as large print and oral presentation, are available. To request alternate sweepstakes entry procedures or materials, contact the Oregon Tourism Commission (dba Travel Oregon) at 800.547.7842. 2. RANDOM DRAWING: Twelve (12) total prizes will be awarded over a 12-month period (May 2019 through April 2020). One prize winner will be selected in a random drawing on or about the 10th of each month from all eligible entries received. Previous prize winners are not eligible to win again during this sweepstakes period. Odds of winning depend upon the number of eligible entries received prior to the drawing. 3. PRIZE: one winner each month will receive a queen-sized Pendleton Woolen Mills Crater Lake National Park blanket. Estimated Retail Value: $259. 4. GENERAL RULES: One entry per person. Sweepstakes is open only to legal residents of the United States (excluding residents of Puerto Rico and where prohibited by law), and Canada except Quebec and where prohibited by law, who are 21 years of age or older at the time of entry.. Employees of the Oregon Tourism Commission, Sparkloft, Wieden+Kennedy, ThinkShout, MEDIAmerica, MyEmma, TenBridges.com, and all Vendors contracted to Travel Oregon, and participating sponsors, their affiliates, subsidiaries, advertising and promotion agencies and their immediate family members and/or those living in the same household of each are not eligible. SWEEPSTAKES IS VOID IN PUERTO RICO AND WHERE PROHIBITED BY LAW. Decisions of the judges are final. Sponsor is not responsible for lost, late, illegible, mutilated or misdirected entries, entries not received in time for the random drawing, or faulty or mistranscribed telephone communication. Winners will be notified by email. Sponsor reserves the right, at its sole discretion, to disqualify any individual it finds to be have tampered with the entry process or the operation of the promotion; to have acted in violation of the Official Rules; to have acted in violation of the terms of the website, or to have acted in a non-sportsmanlike or disruptive manner, or with intent to annoy, abuse, threaten or harass any other person. Sponsor is not responsible for injury or damage to participants’ or to any other person’s computer related to or resulting from participating in this Sweepstakes. Any use of robotic, automatic, macro, programmed, third party, or like entry methods, will disqualify all entries using such methods. No more than the stated number of prizes will be awarded. Entry information and entries become property of Sponsor. In case of dispute, the authorized subscriber of email account used to enter the Promotion, at actual time of entry, will be deemed to be participant and must comply with these Official Rules. The authorized account subscriber is deemed to be natural person who is assigned the email address by an Internet Access Provider, online service provider, or other organization that is responsible for assigning email addresses. No substitution of the prize by the prize winner is permitted. No transfer of the prize by the prize winner is permitted prior to awarding of the prize. All federal, state and local laws apply. All material submitted becomes the sole property of the sponsor and none will be returned. Sponsor reserves the right to substitute prize of equal or greater value. By accepting the prize, winner agrees to hold sponsors and their respective directors, officers, employees and assigns, harmless against any and all claims and liability arising out of use of prize. Winner assumes all liability for any injury or damage caused, or claimed to be caused, by participation in this promotion or use or redemption of any prize. Sponsor is not responsible for any typographical or other errors in the printing of the offer, administration of the sweepstakes, or in the announcement of prizes. 5. By participating in this promotion, participants also agree (a) to be bound by these Official Rules and (b) if selected as a winner, that Sponsor may use each winner’s name, photograph, likeness, and/or voice in any publicity or advertising relating to the Sweepstakes or future promotions without compensation or approval (except in Tennessee and where prohibited by law). All federal, state and local taxes, fees and surcharges on prizes are the sole responsibility of the prize winners. If a prize or prize notification is returned as unclaimed or undeliverable to the potential prize winner, if the potential Winner cannot be reached within five (5) business days from the first notification attempt, or if the potential winner fails to return requisite document(s) within the specified time period, or if the potential winner is not in compliance with these Official Rules, then such person shall be disqualified and, at Sponsor’s sole discretion, an alternate winner may be selected. 6. FOR CANADA ONLY: In addition to the above, to be declared a winner, selected Canadian entrants must have first correctly answered, without assistance of any kind, whether mechanical or otherwise, a mathematical skill-testing question to be administered at a mutually agreeable time. If the selected Canadian entrant fails to correctly answer the skill-testing question, they will be disqualified. In the event of a Canadian winner, Sponsor, at its sole discretion may elect to award winner cash in lieu of the prize or deduct applicable withholding taxes imposed by the U.S. and applicable state governments. 7. WINNER LIST: For the names of the prize winners, available after the sweepstakes has ended, send a separate, stamped, self-addressed (#10) envelope to: 2019-2020 Travel Oregon Email Newsletter Sweepstakes, Prize Winner List, 319 SW Washington St, Suite 700, Portland, OR 97204.

← Back

Thank you for your response. ✨


 Help
Book creator ( disable )
 This page cannot be added Show book (53 pages) Suggest pages
Suggested pages for your book
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
Suggestions are based on the current set of wiki pages in your book. The list is updated whenever you click on the add or remove buttons.
Suggestions (reset)

    United States
    Hudson's Bay Company
    Native Americans in the United States
    Oregon Trail
    British Columbia
    49th parallel north
    Fort Vancouver
    U.S. state
    Alaska
    North West Company

	
Your book (53 pages | show)

    Oregon
    Pacific Northwest
    West Coast of the United States
    Columbia River
    Washington (state)
    Snake River
    Idaho
    California
    Nevada
    Portland metropolitan area
    Portland, Oregon
    List of U.S. states and territories by area
    Oregon Country
    Oregon boundary dispute
    North America
    British North America
    French Canadians
    Fur trade
    Pacific Ocean
    Continental Divide of the Americas
    Montana
    Wyoming
    New Caledonia (Canada)
    Yukon River
    Puget Sound
    George Vancouver
    William Clark
    Simon Fraser (explorer)
    Fraser River
    Willamette Valley
    Champoeg Meetings
    Champoeg, Oregon
    James K. Polk
    Native Hawaiians
    Algonquian peoples
    Iroquois
    American Fur Company
    Lewis and Clark Expedition
    Oregon pioneer history
    History of Oregon
    Oregon Territory
    Northwestern United States
    Rocky Mountains
    Provisional Government of Oregon
    Washington Territory
    Idaho Territory
    Louisiana Purchase
    Alta California
    Russo-American Treaty of 1824
    Oregon Treaty
    Panama
    Eastern Oregon
    Eastern Oregon University

Navigation menu

    Not logged in
    Talk
    Contributions
    Create account
    Log in

    Special page

Search

    Main page
    Contents
    Featured content
    Current events
    Random article
    Donate to Wikipedia
    Wikipedia store

Interaction

    Help
    About Wikipedia
    Community portal
    Recent changes
    Contact page

Tools

    What links here
    Upload file
    Special pages
    Printable version
    Page information

Languages

    Privacy policy
    About Wikipedia
    Disclaimers
    Contact Wikipedia
    Developers
    Cookie statement
    Mobile view

    Wikimedia Foundation	
    Powered by MediaWiki
Skip to content Travel Oregon



 Help
Book creator ( disable )
 This page cannot be added Show book (53 pages) Suggest pages

Suggested pages for your book


Jump to navigation Jump to search Suggestions are based on the current set of wiki pages in your book. The list is updated whenever you click on the add or remove buttons.
Suggestions (reset) United States
Hudson’s Bay Company
Native Americans in the United States
Oregon Trail
British Columbia
49th parallel north
Fort Vancouver
U.S. state
Alaska
North West Company
Your book (53 pages | show) Oregon
Pacific Northwest
West Coast of the United States
Columbia River
Washington (state)
Snake River
Idaho
California
Nevada
Portland metropolitan area
Portland, Oregon
List of U.S. states and territories by area
Oregon Country
Oregon boundary dispute
North America
British North America
French Canadians
Fur trade
Pacific Ocean
Continental Divide of the Americas
Montana
Wyoming
New Caledonia (Canada)
Yukon River
Puget Sound
George Vancouver
William Clark
Simon Fraser (explorer)
Fraser River
Willamette Valley
Champoeg Meetings
Champoeg, Oregon
James K. Polk
Native Hawaiians
Algonquian peoples
Iroquois
American Fur Company
Lewis and Clark Expedition
Oregon pioneer history
History of Oregon
Oregon Territory
Northwestern United States
Rocky Mountains
Provisional Government of Oregon
Washington Territory
Idaho Territory
Louisiana Purchase
Alta California
Russo-American Treaty of 1824
Oregon Treaty
Panama
Eastern Oregon
Eastern Oregon University


Navigation menu
Not logged in
Talk
Contributions
Create account
Log in
Special page
Search



Main page
Contents
Featured content
Current events
Random article
Donate to Wikipedia
Wikipedia store
Interaction
Help
About Wikipedia
Community portal
Recent changes
Contact page
Tools
What links here
Upload file
Special pages
Printable version
Page information

Languages

Privacy policy
About Wikipedia
Disclaimers
Contact Wikipedia
Developers
Cookie statement
Mobile view





Primary Menu
Places to Go
Things to Do
Plan Your Trip
Free Travel Guides
Email Newsletters


Places to Go
: Pacific Coast Scenic Byway by Kenji Sugahara
Places to Go
Ready to hit the road? In Oregon it’s about the journey as much as the destination.
And the destinations are pretty great here. Go ahead, take a look around.


Oregon’s 7 Regions



Cities



Destinations


Trip Ideas
More Trip Ideas

12 Sunny Dog Spots in Oregon If your four-legged friend is your favorite adventure sidekick, spring and summer are the seasons to explore Oregon together. The days get gloriously long and sunny. And the water — rivers, ocean and lakes —… More
Kerry Newberry

Accessible Trails Oregon’s natural beauty is here for everyone. Our rushing waterfalls, verdant hiking trails and scenic viewpoints inspire people of all ages and ability levels. For those with limits to their mobility, we offer the following… More
Jen Anderson

Cool Places to Stay for Outdoor Adventures For those outdoor enthusiasts who prefer a cushy bed over a sleeping bag, we’ve rounded up a host of accommodations from luxe properties and cozy bed-and-breakfasts to only-in-Oregon resorts and timeless lodges. More
Samantha Bakall
Oregon’s 7 Regions
Explore Regions

Central Oregon

Eastern Oregon

Portland Region

Mt. Hood & Columbia River Gorge

Oregon Coast

Southern Oregon

Willamette Valley
Advertisements



Cities in Oregon
Explore Cities

Bend Central Oregon

Joseph Eastern Oregon

Ashland Southern Oregon

Oregon City Portland Region

The Dalles Mt. Hood & Columbia River Gorge

Portland Portland Region

Newport Oregon Coast

Eugene Willamette Valley
Oregon Destinations
Explore Destinations

Mountains

Waterfalls

Lakes & Reservoirs

Rivers & Streams

Parks, Forests & Wildlife Areas

Ghost Towns
The 7 Wonders of Oregon
See More

Mt. Hood Mount Hood, Mt. Hood & Columbia River Gorge

Oregon Coast

Columbia River Gorge

Painted Hills Mitchell, Eastern Oregon

Smith Rock Terrebonne, Central Oregon

The Wallowas Joseph, Eastern Oregon

Crater Lake Klamath Falls, Southern Oregon
Ready to hit the road? Bring our travel magazine along.
Free Travel Guides
Let’s keep in touch. We have a lot of ideas for you.
Email Newsletters

About
About Travel Oregon
Advertise With Us
Write for Travel Oregon
Privacy Policy & Terms of Use
Travel Industry
Donate to the Travel Oregon Forever Fund
Submit Your Lodging Listing
Travel Industry
Travel Oregon Press Room
Recognition Programs
Explore
Ask Oregon
Oregon Visitor Centers
Oregon Weather
Travel Alerts
Partners
Visit the USA
Trip Advisor
Facebook
Twitter
YouTube
Instagram
Pinterest
Snapchat
©2019 Travel Oregon | The official guide to Oregon travel and tourism information.
To contact us, call 1-800-547-7842 or email info@traveloregon.com
Français
Deutsch
日本語
中文
Korean (PDF)
Español
Privacy & TERMS



Skip to content

Travel Oregon
Primary Menu

    Places to Go
    Things to Do
    Plan Your Trip

    Free Travel Guides
    Email Newsletters

Places to Go
: Pacific Coast Scenic Byway by Kenji Sugahara
Places to Go

Ready to hit the road? In Oregon it’s about the journey as much as the destination.

And the destinations are pretty great here. Go ahead, take a look around.
Oregon’s 7 Regions
Cities
Destinations
Trip Ideas
More Trip Ideas

    12 Sunny Dog Spots in Oregon
    If your four-legged friend is your favorite adventure sidekick, spring and summer are the seasons to explore Oregon together. The days get gloriously long and sunny. And the water — rivers, ocean and lakes —... More
    Kerry Newberry
    Wildwood State Recreation Site courtesy of Oregon's Mt. Hood Territory
    Accessible Trails
    Oregon’s natural beauty is here for everyone. Our rushing waterfalls, verdant hiking trails and scenic viewpoints inspire people of all ages and ability levels. For those with limits to their mobility, we offer the following... More
    Jen Anderson
    Cool Places to Stay for Outdoor Adventures
    For those outdoor enthusiasts who prefer a cushy bed over a sleeping bag, we’ve rounded up a host of accommodations from luxe properties and cozy bed-and-breakfasts to only-in-Oregon resorts and timeless lodges. More
    Samantha Bakall

Oregon's 7 Regions
Explore Regions
Central Oregon
Eastern Oregon
Portland Region
Mt. Hood & Columbia River Gorge
Oregon Coast
Southern Oregon
Willamette Valley
Advertisements
Cities in Oregon
Explore Cities
Bend
Central Oregon
Joseph
Eastern Oregon
Ashland
Southern Oregon
Oregon City
Portland Region
The Dalles
Mt. Hood & Columbia River Gorge
Portland
Portland Region
Newport
Oregon Coast
Eugene
Willamette Valley
Oregon Destinations
Explore Destinations
Mountains
Waterfalls
Lakes & Reservoirs
Rivers & Streams
Parks, Forests & Wildlife Areas
Ghost Towns
The 7 Wonders of Oregon
See More
Mt. Hood
Mount Hood, Mt. Hood & Columbia River Gorge
Oregon Coast
Columbia River Gorge
Painted Hills
Mitchell, Eastern Oregon
Smith Rock
Terrebonne, Central Oregon
The Wallowas
Joseph, Eastern Oregon
Crater Lake
Klamath Falls, Southern Oregon
Ready to hit the road? Bring our travel magazine along.

Free Travel Guides
Let's keep in touch. We have a lot of ideas for you.

Email Newsletters

About

    About Travel Oregon
    Advertise With Us
    Write for Travel Oregon
    Privacy Policy & Terms of Use

Travel Industry

    Donate to the Travel Oregon Forever Fund
    Submit Your Lodging Listing
    Travel Industry
    Travel Oregon Press Room
    Recognition Programs

Explore

    Ask Oregon
    Oregon Visitor Centers
    Oregon Weather
    Travel Alerts

Partners

    Visit the USA Trip Advisor 

    Facebook Twitter YouTube Instagram Pinterest Snapchat 

©2019 Travel Oregon | The official guide to Oregon travel and tourism information.
To contact us, call 1-800-547-7842 or email info@traveloregon.com

    Français Deutsch 日本語 中文 Korean (PDF) Español 

    Privacy & TERMS
Skip to content Travel Oregon


Primary Menu
Places to Go
Things to Do
Plan Your Trip
Free Travel Guides
Email Newsletters


Places to Go
: Pacific Coast Scenic Byway by Kenji Sugahara
Places to Go
Ready to hit the road? In Oregon it’s about the journey as much as the destination.
And the destinations are pretty great here. Go ahead, take a look around.


Oregon’s 7 Regions



Cities



Destinations


Trip Ideas
More Trip Ideas

12 Sunny Dog Spots in Oregon If your four-legged friend is your favorite adventure sidekick, spring and summer are the seasons to explore Oregon together. The days get gloriously long and sunny. And the water — rivers, ocean and lakes —… More
Kerry Newberry

Accessible Trails Oregon’s natural beauty is here for everyone. Our rushing waterfalls, verdant hiking trails and scenic viewpoints inspire people of all ages and ability levels. For those with limits to their mobility, we offer the following… More
Jen Anderson

Cool Places to Stay for Outdoor Adventures For those outdoor enthusiasts who prefer a cushy bed over a sleeping bag, we’ve rounded up a host of accommodations from luxe properties and cozy bed-and-breakfasts to only-in-Oregon resorts and timeless lodges. More
Samantha Bakall
Oregon’s 7 Regions
Explore Regions

Central Oregon

Eastern Oregon

Portland Region

Mt. Hood & Columbia River Gorge

Oregon Coast

Southern Oregon

Willamette Valley
Advertisements



Cities in Oregon
Explore Cities

Bend Central Oregon

Joseph Eastern Oregon

Ashland Southern Oregon

Oregon City Portland Region

The Dalles Mt. Hood & Columbia River Gorge

Portland Portland Region

Newport Oregon Coast

Eugene Willamette Valley
Oregon Destinations
Explore Destinations

Mountains

Waterfalls

Lakes & Reservoirs

Rivers & Streams

Parks, Forests & Wildlife Areas

Ghost Towns
The 7 Wonders of Oregon
See More

Mt. Hood Mount Hood, Mt. Hood & Columbia River Gorge

Oregon Coast

Columbia River Gorge

Painted Hills Mitchell, Eastern Oregon

Smith Rock Terrebonne, Central Oregon

The Wallowas Joseph, Eastern Oregon

Crater Lake Klamath Falls, Southern Oregon
Ready to hit the road? Bring our travel magazine along.
Free Travel Guides
Let’s keep in touch. We have a lot of ideas for you.
Email Newsletters

About
About Travel Oregon
Advertise With Us
Write for Travel Oregon
Privacy Policy & Terms of Use
Travel Industry
Donate to the Travel Oregon Forever Fund
Submit Your Lodging Listing
Travel Industry
Travel Oregon Press Room
Recognition Programs
Explore
Ask Oregon
Oregon Visitor Centers
Oregon Weather
Travel Alerts
Partners
Visit the USA
Trip Advisor
Facebook
Twitter
YouTube
Instagram
Pinterest
Snapchat
©2019 Travel Oregon | The official guide to Oregon travel and tourism information.
To contact us, call 1-800-547-7842 or email info@traveloregon.com
Français
Deutsch
日本語
中文
Korean (PDF)
Español
Privacy & TERMS


 Help Book creator ( disable )  Remove this page from your book Show book (71 pages) Suggest pages

Biotechnology

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia Jump to navigationJump to search For other uses, see Biotechnology (disambiguation).

Insulin crystals

Biotechnology (commonly abbreviated as biotech) is the broad area of biology involving living systems and organisms to develop or make products, or “any technological application that uses biological systems, living organisms, or derivatives thereof, to make or modify products or processes for specific use” (UN Convention on Biological Diversity, Art. 2).[1] Depending on the tools and applications, it often overlaps with the (related) fields of molecular biology, bio-engineering, biomedical engineering, biomanufacturing, molecular engineering, etc.

For thousands of years, humankind has used biotechnology in agriculture, food production, and medicine.[2] The term is largely believed to have been coined in 1919 by Hungarian engineer Károly Ereky. In the late 20th and early 21st centuries, biotechnology has expanded to include new and diverse sciences such as genomics, recombinant gene techniques, applied immunology, and development of pharmaceutical therapies and diagnostic tests.[2]

Contents

Definitions

The wide concept of “biotech” or “biotechnology” encompasses a wide range of procedures for modifying living organisms according to human purposes, going back to domestication of animals, cultivation of the plants, and “improvements” to these through breeding programs that employ artificial selection and hybridization. Modern usage also includes genetic engineering as well as cell and tissue culture technologies. The American Chemical Society defines biotechnology as the application of biological organisms, systems, or processes by various industries to learning about the science of life and the improvement of the value of materials and organisms such as pharmaceuticals, crops, and livestock.[3] Per the European Federation of Biotechnology, biotechnology is the integration of natural science and organisms, cells, parts thereof, and molecular analogues for products and services.[4] Biotechnology is based on the basic biological sciences (e.g. molecular biology, biochemistry, cell biology, embryology, genetics, microbiology) and conversely provides methods to support and perform basic research in biology.

Biotechnology is the research and development in the laboratory using bioinformatics for exploration, extraction, exploitation and production from any living organisms and any source of biomass by means of biochemical engineering where high value-added products could be planned (reproduced by biosynthesis, for example), forecasted, formulated, developed, manufactured, and marketed for the purpose of sustainable operations (for the return from bottomless initial investment on R & D) and gaining durable patents rights (for exclusives rights for sales, and prior to this to receive national and international approval from the results on animal experiment and human experiment, especially on the pharmaceutical branch of biotechnology to prevent any undetected side-effects or safety concerns by using the products).[5][6][7] The utilization of biological processes, organisms or systems to produce products that are anticipated to improve human lives is termed biotechnology.[8]

By contrast, bioengineering is generally thought of as a related field that more heavily emphasizes higher systems approaches (not necessarily the altering or using of biological materials directly) for interfacing with and utilizing living things. Bioengineering is the application of the principles of engineering and natural sciences to tissues, cells and molecules. This can be considered as the use of knowledge from working with and manipulating biology to achieve a result that can improve functions in plants and animals.[9] Relatedly, biomedical engineering is an overlapping field that often draws upon and applies biotechnology (by various definitions), especially in certain sub-fields of biomedical or chemical engineering such as tissue engineering, biopharmaceutical engineering, and genetic engineering.

History

Brewing was an early application of biotechnology Main article: History of biotechnology

Although not normally what first comes to mind, many forms of human-derived agriculture clearly fit the broad definition of “‘utilizing a biotechnological system to make products”. Indeed, the cultivation of plants may be viewed as the earliest biotechnological enterprise.

Agriculture has been theorized to have become the dominant way of producing food since the Neolithic Revolution. Through early biotechnology, the earliest farmers selected and bred the best suited crops, having the highest yields, to produce enough food to support a growing population. As crops and fields became increasingly large and difficult to maintain, it was discovered that specific organisms and their by-products could effectively fertilize, restore nitrogen, and control pests. Throughout the history of agriculture, farmers have inadvertently altered the genetics of their crops through introducing them to new environments and breeding them with other plants — one of the first forms of biotechnology.

These processes also were included in early fermentation of beer.[10] These processes were introduced in early Mesopotamia, Egypt, China and India, and still use the same basic biological methods. In brewing, malted grains (containing enzymes) convert starch from grains into sugar and then adding specific yeasts to produce beer. In this process, carbohydrates in the grains broke down into alcohols, such as ethanol. Later, other cultures produced the process of lactic acid fermentation, which produced other preserved foods, such as soy sauce. Fermentation was also used in this time period to produce leavened bread. Although the process of fermentation was not fully understood until Louis Pasteur‘s work in 1857, it is still the first use of biotechnology to convert a food source into another form.

Before the time of Charles Darwin‘s work and life, animal and plant scientists had already used selective breeding. Darwin added to that body of work with his scientific observations about the ability of science to change species. These accounts contributed to Darwin’s theory of natural selection.[11]

For thousands of years, humans have used selective breeding to improve production of crops and livestock to use them for food. In selective breeding, organisms with desirable characteristics are mated to produce offspring with the same characteristics. For example, this technique was used with corn to produce the largest and sweetest crops.[12]

In the early twentieth century scientists gained a greater understanding of microbiology and explored ways of manufacturing specific products. In 1917, Chaim Weizmann first used a pure microbiological culture in an industrial process, that of manufacturing corn starch using Clostridium acetobutylicum, to produce acetone, which the United Kingdom desperately needed to manufacture explosives during World War I.[13]

Biotechnology has also led to the development of antibiotics. In 1928, Alexander Fleming discovered the mold Penicillium. His work led to the purification of the antibiotic compound formed by the mold by Howard Florey, Ernst Boris Chain and Norman Heatley – to form what we today know as penicillin. In 1940, penicillin became available for medicinal use to treat bacterial infections in humans.[12]

The field of modern biotechnology is generally thought of as having been born in 1971 when Paul Berg’s (Stanford) experiments in gene splicing had early success. Herbert W. Boyer (Univ. Calif. at San Francisco) and Stanley N. Cohen (Stanford) significantly advanced the new technology in 1972 by transferring genetic material into a bacterium, such that the imported material would be reproduced. The commercial viability of a biotechnology industry was significantly expanded on June 16, 1980, when the United States Supreme Court ruled that a genetically modified microorganism could be patented in the case of Diamond v. Chakrabarty.[14] Indian-born Ananda Chakrabarty, working for General Electric, had modified a bacterium (of the genus Pseudomonas) capable of breaking down crude oil, which he proposed to use in treating oil spills. (Chakrabarty’s work did not involve gene manipulation but rather the transfer of entire organelles between strains of the Pseudomonas bacterium.

Revenue in the industry is expected to grow by 12.9% in 2008.

This section needs to be updated. Please update this article to reflect recent events or newly available information. (October 2018)

Another factor influencing the biotechnology sector’s success is improved intellectual property rights legislation—and enforcement—worldwide, as well as strengthened demand for medical and pharmaceutical products to cope with an ageing, and ailing, U.S. population.[15]

Rising demand for biofuels is expected to be good news for the biotechnology sector, with the Department of Energy estimating ethanol usage could reduce U.S. petroleum-derived fuel consumption by up to 30% by 2030. The biotechnology sector has allowed the U.S. farming industry to rapidly increase its supply of corn and soybeans—the main inputs into biofuels—by developing genetically modified seeds that resist pests and drought. By increasing farm productivity, biotechnology boosts biofuel production.[16]

Examples

A rose plant that began as cells grown in a tissue culture

Biotechnology has applications in four major industrial areas, including health care (medical), crop production and agriculture, non-food (industrial) uses of crops and other products (e.g. biodegradable plastics, vegetable oil, biofuels, and environmental uses).

For example, one application of biotechnology is the directed use of microorganisms for the manufacture of organic products (examples include beer and milk products). Another example is using naturally present bacteria by the mining industry in bioleaching. Biotechnology is also used to recycle, treat waste, clean up sites contaminated by industrial activities (bioremediation), and also to produce biological weapons.

A series of derived terms have been coined to identify several branches of biotechnology, for example:

  • Bioinformatics (also called “gold biotechnology”) is an interdisciplinary field that addresses biological problems using computational techniques, and makes the rapid organization as well as analysis of biological data possible. The field may also be referred to as computational biology, and can be defined as, “conceptualizing biology in terms of molecules and then applying informatics techniques to understand and organize the information associated with these molecules, on a large scale.”[17] Bioinformatics plays a key role in various areas, such as functional genomics, structural genomics, and proteomics, and forms a key component in the biotechnology and pharmaceutical sector.[18]
  • Blue biotechnology is based on the exploitation of sea resources to create products and industrial applications.[19] This branch of biotechnology is the most used for the industries of refining and combustion principally on the production of bio-oils with photosynthetic micro-algae.[19][20]
  • Green biotechnology is biotechnology applied to agricultural processes. An example would be the selection and domestication of plants via micropropagation. Another example is the designing of transgenic plants to grow under specific environments in the presence (or absence) of chemicals. One hope is that green biotechnology might produce more environmentally friendly solutions than traditional industrial agriculture. An example of this is the engineering of a plant to express a pesticide, thereby ending the need of external application of pesticides. An example of this would be Bt corn. Whether or not green biotechnology products such as this are ultimately more environmentally friendly is a topic of considerable debate.[19] It is commonly considered as the next phase of green revolution, which can be seen as a platform to eradicate world hunger by using technologies which enable the production of more fertile and resistant, towards biotic and abiotic stress, plants and ensures application of environmentally friendly fertilizers and the use of biopesticides, it is mainly focused on the development of agriculture.[19] On the other hand, some of the uses of green biotechnology involve microorganisms to clean and reduce waste.[21][19]
  • Red biotechnology is the use of biotechnology in the medical and pharmaceutical industries, and health preservation.[19] This branch involves the production of vaccines and antibiotics, regenerative therapies, creation of artificial organs and new diagnostics of diseases.[19] As well as the development of hormones, stem cells, antibodies, siRNA and diagnostic tests.[19]
  • White biotechnology, also known as industrial biotechnology, is biotechnology applied to industrial processes. An example is the designing of an organism to produce a useful chemical. Another example is the using of enzymes as industrial catalysts to either produce valuable chemicals or destroy hazardous/polluting chemicals. White biotechnology tends to consume less in resources than traditional processes used to produce industrial goods.[22][23]
  • “Yellow biotechnology” refers to the use of biotechnology in food production, for example in making wine, cheese, and beer by fermentation.[19] It has also been used to refer to biotechnology applied to insects. This includes biotechnology-based approaches for the control of harmful insects, the characterisation and utilisation of active ingredients or genes of insects for research, or application in agriculture and medicine and various other approaches.[24]
  • Gray biotechnology is dedicated to environmental applications, and focused on the maintenance of biodiversity and the remotion of pollutants.[19]
  • Brown biotechnology is related to the management of arid lands and deserts. One application is the creation of enhanced seeds that resist extreme environmental conditions of arid regions, which is related to the innovation, creation of agriculture techniques and management of resources.[19]
  • Violet biotechnology is related to law, ethical and philosophical issues around biotechnology.[19]
  • Dark biotechnology is the color associated with bioterrorism or biological weapons and biowarfare which uses microorganisms, and toxins to cause diseases and death in humans, livestock and crops.[25][19]

Medicine

In medicine, modern biotechnology has many applications in areas such as pharmaceutical drug discoveries and production, pharmacogenomics, and genetic testing (or genetic screening).

DNA microarray chip – some can do as many as a million blood tests at once

Pharmacogenomics (a combination of pharmacology and genomics) is the technology that analyses how genetic makeup affects an individual’s response to drugs.[26] Researchers in the field investigate the influence of genetic variation on drug responses in patients by correlating gene expression or single-nucleotide polymorphisms with a drug’s efficacy or toxicity.[27] The purpose of pharmacogenomics is to develop rational means to optimize drug therapy, with respect to the patients’ genotype, to ensure maximum efficacy with minimal adverse effects.[28] Such approaches promise the advent of “personalized medicine“; in which drugs and drug combinations are optimized for each individual’s unique genetic makeup.[29][30]

Computer-generated image of insulin hexamers highlighting the threefold symmetry, the zinc ions holding it together, and the histidine residues involved in zinc binding.

Biotechnology has contributed to the discovery and manufacturing of traditional small molecule pharmaceutical drugs as well as drugs that are the product of biotechnology – biopharmaceutics. Modern biotechnology can be used to manufacture existing medicines relatively easily and cheaply. The first genetically engineered products were medicines designed to treat human diseases. To cite one example, in 1978 Genentech developed synthetic humanized insulin by joining its gene with a plasmid vector inserted into the bacterium Escherichia coli. Insulin, widely used for the treatment of diabetes, was previously extracted from the pancreas of abattoir animals (cattle or pigs). The genetically engineered bacteria are able to produce large quantities of synthetic human insulin at relatively low cost.[31][32] Biotechnology has also enabled emerging therapeutics like gene therapy. The application of biotechnology to basic science (for example through the Human Genome Project) has also dramatically improved our understanding of biology and as our scientific knowledge of normal and disease biology has increased, our ability to develop new medicines to treat previously untreatable diseases has increased as well.[32]

Genetic testing allows the genetic diagnosis of vulnerabilities to inherited diseases, and can also be used to determine a child’s parentage (genetic mother and father) or in general a person’s ancestry. In addition to studying chromosomes to the level of individual genes, genetic testing in a broader sense includes biochemical tests for the possible presence of genetic diseases, or mutant forms of genes associated with increased risk of developing genetic disorders. Genetic testing identifies changes in chromosomes, genes, or proteins.[33] Most of the time, testing is used to find changes that are associated with inherited disorders. The results of a genetic test can confirm or rule out a suspected genetic condition or help determine a person’s chance of developing or passing on a genetic disorder. As of 2011 several hundred genetic tests were in use.[34][35] Since genetic testing may open up ethical or psychological problems, genetic testing is often accompanied by genetic counseling.

Agriculture

Genetically modified crops (“GM crops”, or “biotech crops”) are plants used in agriculture, the DNA of which has been modified with genetic engineering techniques. In most cases, the main aim is to introduce a new trait that does not occur naturally in the species. Biotechnology firms can contribute to future food security by improving the nutrition and viability of urban agriculture. Furthermore, the protection of intellectual property rights encourages private sector investment in agrobiotechnology. For example, in Illinois FARM Illinois (Food and Agriculture RoadMap for Illinois) is an initiative to develop and coordinate farmers, industry, research institutions, government, and nonprofits in pursuit of food and agriculture innovation. In addition, the Illinois Biotechnology Industry Organization (iBIO) is a life sciences industry association with more than 500 life sciences companies, universities, academic institutions, service providers and others as members. The association describes its members as “dedicated to making Illinois and the surrounding Midwest one of the world’s top life sciences centers.”[36]

Examples in food crops include resistance to certain pests,[37] diseases,[38] stressful environmental conditions,[39] resistance to chemical treatments (e.g. resistance to a herbicide[40]), reduction of spoilage,[41] or improving the nutrient profile of the crop.[42] Examples in non-food crops include production of pharmaceutical agents,[43] biofuels,[44] and other industrially useful goods,[45] as well as for bioremediation.[46][47]

Farmers have widely adopted GM technology. Between 1996 and 2011, the total surface area of land cultivated with GM crops had increased by a factor of 94, from 17,000 square kilometers (4,200,000 acres) to 1,600,000 km2 (395 million acres).[48] 10% of the world’s crop lands were planted with GM crops in 2010.[48] As of 2011, 11 different transgenic crops were grown commercially on 395 million acres (160 million hectares) in 29 countries such as the US, Brazil, Argentina, India, Canada, China, Paraguay, Pakistan, South Africa, Uruguay, Bolivia, Australia, Philippines, Myanmar, Burkina Faso, Mexico and Spain.[48]

Genetically modified foods are foods produced from organisms that have had specific changes introduced into their DNA with the methods of genetic engineering. These techniques have allowed for the introduction of new crop traits as well as a far greater control over a food’s genetic structure than previously afforded by methods such as selective breeding and mutation breeding.[49] Commercial sale of genetically modified foods began in 1994, when Calgene first marketed its Flavr Savr delayed ripening tomato.[50] To date most genetic modification of foods have primarily focused on cash crops in high demand by farmers such as soybean, corn, canola, and cotton seed oil. These have been engineered for resistance to pathogens and herbicides and better nutrient profiles. GM livestock have also been experimentally developed; in November 2013 none were available on the market,[51] but in 2015 the FDA approved the first GM salmon for commercial production and consumption.[52]

There is a scientific consensus[53][54][55][56][57][58][59] that currently available food derived from GM crops poses no greater risk to human health than conventional food,[60][61][62][63][64][65][66] but that each GM food must be tested on a case-by-case basis before introduction.[67][68][69] Nonetheless, members of the public are much less likely than scientists to perceive GM foods as safe.[70][71][72][73] The legal and regulatory status of GM foods varies by country, with some nations banning or restricting them, and others permitting them with widely differing degrees of regulation.[74][75][76][77]

GM crops also provide a number of ecological benefits, if not used in excess.[78] However, opponents have objected to GM crops per se on several grounds, including environmental concerns, whether food produced from GM crops is safe, whether GM crops are needed to address the world’s food needs, and economic concerns raised by the fact these organisms are subject to intellectual property law.

Industrial

Industrial biotechnology (known mainly in Europe as white biotechnology) is the application of biotechnology for industrial purposes, including industrial fermentation. It includes the practice of using cells such as microorganisms, or components of cells like enzymes, to generate industrially useful products in sectors such as chemicals, food and feed, detergents, paper and pulp, textiles and biofuels.[79] In the current decades, significant progress has been done in creating genetically modified organisms (GMOs) that enhance the diversity of applications and economical viability of industrial biotechnology. By using renewable raw materials to produce a variety of chemicals and fuels, industrial biotechnology is actively advancing towards lowering greenhouse gas emissions and moving away from a petrochemical-based economy.[80]

Environmental

The environment can be affected by biotechnologies, both positively and adversely. Vallero and others have argued that the difference between beneficial biotechnology (e.g.bioremediation is to clean up an oil spill or hazard chemical leak) versus the adverse effects stemming from biotechnological enterprises (e.g. flow of genetic material from transgenic organisms into wild strains) can be seen as applications and implications, respectively.[81] Cleaning up environmental wastes is an example of an application of environmental biotechnology; whereas loss of biodiversity or loss of containment of a harmful microbe are examples of environmental implications of biotechnology.

Regulation

Main articles: Regulation of genetic engineering and Regulation of the release of genetic modified organisms

The regulation of genetic engineering concerns approaches taken by governments to assess and manage the risks associated with the use of genetic engineering technology, and the development and release of genetically modified organisms (GMO), including genetically modified crops and genetically modified fish. There are differences in the regulation of GMOs between countries, with some of the most marked differences occurring between the USA and Europe.[82] Regulation varies in a given country depending on the intended use of the products of the genetic engineering. For example, a crop not intended for food use is generally not reviewed by authorities responsible for food safety.[83] The European Union differentiates between approval for cultivation within the EU and approval for import and processing. While only a few GMOs have been approved for cultivation in the EU a number of GMOs have been approved for import and processing.[84] The cultivation of GMOs has triggered a debate about coexistence of GM and non GM crops. Depending on the coexistence regulations, incentives for cultivation of GM crops differ.[85]

Learning

In 1988, after prompting from the United States Congress, the National Institute of General Medical Sciences (National Institutes of Health) (NIGMS) instituted a funding mechanism for biotechnology training. Universities nationwide compete for these funds to establish Biotechnology Training Programs (BTPs). Each successful application is generally funded for five years then must be competitively renewed. Graduate students in turn compete for acceptance into a BTP; if accepted, then stipend, tuition and health insurance support is provided for two or three years during the course of their Ph.D. thesis work. Nineteen institutions offer NIGMS supported BTPs.[86] Biotechnology training is also offered at the undergraduate level and in community colleges.

See also

References and notes

Text of the CBD. CBD.int. Retrieved on March 20, 2013. “Incorporating Biotechnology into the Classroom What is Biotechnology?”, from the curricula of the ‘Incorporating Biotechnology into the High School Classroom through Arizona State University’s BioREACH program’, accessed on October 16, 2012). Public.asu.edu. Retrieved on March 20, 2013. BiotechnologyArchived November 7, 2012, at the Wayback Machine. Portal.acs.org. Retrieved on March 20, 2013. “Archived copy” (PDF). Archived from the original (PDF) on August 7, 2015. Retrieved December 29, 2014. What is biotechnology?. Europabio. Retrieved on March 20, 2013. Key Biotechnology Indicators (December 2011). oecd.org Biotechnology policies – Organization for Economic Co-operation and Development. Oecd.org. Retrieved on March 20, 2013. “History, scope and development of biotechnology”. iopscience.iop.org. Retrieved October 30, 2018. What Is Bioengineering?Archived January 23, 2013, at the Wayback Machine. Bionewsonline.com. Retrieved on March 20, 2013. See Arnold JP (2005). Origin and History of Beer and Brewing: From Prehistoric Times to the Beginning of Brewing Science and Technology. Cleveland, Ohio: BeerBooks. p. 34. ISBN978-0-9662084-1-2. OCLC71834130.. Cole-Turner R (2003). “Biotechnology”. Encyclopedia of Science and Religion. Retrieved December 7, 2014. Thieman WJ, Palladino MA (2008). Introduction to Biotechnology. Pearson/Benjamin Cummings. ISBN978-0-321-49145-9. Springham D, Springham G, Moses V, Cape RE (1999). Biotechnology: The Science and the Business. CRC Press. p. 1. ISBN978-90-5702-407-8. “Diamond v. Chakrabarty, 447 U.S. 303 (1980). No. 79-139.” United States Supreme Court. June 16, 1980. Retrieved on May 4, 2007. VoIP Providers And Corn Farmers Can Expect To Have Bumper Years In 2008 And Beyond, According To The Latest Research Released By Business Information Analysts At IBISWorld. Los Angeles (March 19, 2008) The Recession List — Top 10 Industries to Fly and Fl… (ith anincreasing share accounted for by …), bio-medicine.org Gerstein, M. “Bioinformatics IntroductionArchived 2007-06-16 at the Wayback Machine.” Yale University. Retrieved on May 8, 2007. Siam, R. (2009). Biotechnology Research and Development in Academia: providing the foundation for Egypt’s Biotechnology spectrum of colors. Sixteenth Annual American University in Cairo Research Conference, American University in Cairo, Cairo, Egypt. BMC Proceedings, 31–35. Kafarski, P. (2012). Rainbow Code of Biotechnology. CHEMIK. Wroclaw University Biotech: true colours. (2009). TCE: The Chemical Engineer, (816), 26–31. Aldridge, S. (2009). The four colours of biotechnology: the biotechnology sector is occasionally described as a rainbow, with each sub sector having its own colour. But what do the different colours of biotechnology have to offer the pharmaceutical industry?. Pharmaceutical Technology Europe, (1). 12. Frazzetto G (September 2003). “White biotechnology”. EMBO Reports. 4 (9): 835–7. doi:10.1038/sj.embor.embor928. PMC1326365. PMID12949582. Frazzetto, G. (2003). White biotechnology. 21/03/2017, de EMBOpress Sitio Advances in Biochemical Engineering/Biotechnology, Volume 135 2013, Yellow Biotechnology I Edgar, J.D. (2004). The Colours of Biotechnology: Science, Development and Humankind. Electronic Journal of Biotechnology, (3), 01 Ermak G. (2013) Modern Science & Future Medicine (second edition) Wang L (2010). “Pharmacogenomics: a systems approach”. Wiley Interdisciplinary Reviews: Systems Biology and Medicine. 2 (1): 3–22. doi:10.1002/wsbm.42. PMC3894835. PMID20836007. Becquemont L (June 2009). “Pharmacogenomics of adverse drug reactions: practical applications and perspectives”. Pharmacogenomics. 10 (6): 961–9. doi:10.2217/pgs.09.37. PMID19530963. “Guidance for Industry Pharmacogenomic Data Submissions” (PDF). U.S. Food and Drug Administration. March 2005. Retrieved August 27, 2008. Squassina A, Manchia M, Manolopoulos VG, Artac M, Lappa-Manakou C, Karkabouna S, Mitropoulos K, Del Zompo M, Patrinos GP (August 2010). “Realities and expectations of pharmacogenomics and personalized medicine: impact of translating genetic knowledge into clinical practice”. Pharmacogenomics. 11 (8): 1149–67. doi:10.2217/pgs.10.97. PMID20712531. Bains W (1987). Genetic Engineering For Almost Everybody: What Does It Do? What Will It Do?. Penguin. p. 99. ISBN978-0-14-013501-5. U.S. Department of State International Information Programs, “Frequently Asked Questions About Biotechnology”, USIS Online; available from USinfo.state.govArchived September 12, 2007, at the Wayback Machine, accessed September 13, 2007. Cf. Feldbaum C (February 2002). “Biotechnology. Some history should be repeated”. Science. 295 (5557): 975. doi:10.1126/science.1069614. PMID11834802. “What is genetic testing? – Genetics Home Reference”. Ghr.nlm.nih.gov. May 30, 2011. Retrieved June 7, 2011. “Genetic Testing: MedlinePlus”. Nlm.nih.gov. Retrieved June 7, 2011. “Definitions of Genetic Testing”. Definitions of Genetic Testing (Jorge Sequeiros and Bárbara Guimarães). EuroGentest Network of Excellence Project. September 11, 2008. Archived from the original on February 4, 2009. Retrieved August 10, 2008. Mazany, Terry (May 19, 2015). “A FOOD AND AGRICULTURE ROADMAP FOR ILLINOIS” (PDF). learnbioscience.com/blog. Genetically Altered Potato Ok’d For Crops Lawrence Journal-World – May 6, 1995 National Academy of Sciences (2001). Transgenic Plants and World Agriculture. Washington: National Academy Press. Paarlburg R (January 2011). “Drought Tolerant GMO Maize in Africa, Anticipating Regulatory Hurdles” (PDF). International Life Sciences Institute. Archived from the original (PDF) on December 22, 2014. Retrieved April 25, 2011. Carpenter J. & Gianessi L. (1999). Herbicide tolerant soybeans: Why growers are adopting Roundup Ready varieties. AgBioForum, 2(2), 65–72. Haroldsen VM, Paulino G, Chi-ham C, Bennett AB (2012). “Research and adoption of biotechnology strategies could improve California fruit and nut crops” (PDF). California Agriculture. 66 (2): 62–69. doi:10.3733/ca.v066n02p62. Archived from the original (PDF) on May 11, 2013. About Golden RiceArchived November 2, 2012, at the Wayback Machine. Irri.org. Retrieved on March 20, 2013. Gali Weinreb and Koby Yeshayahou for Globes May 2, 2012. FDA approves Protalix Gaucher treatmentArchived May 29, 2013, at the Wayback Machine Carrington, Damien (January 19, 2012) GM microbe breakthrough paves way for large-scale seaweed farming for biofuels The Guardian. Retrieved March 12, 2012 van Beilen JB, Poirier Y (May 2008). “Production of renewable polymers from crop plants”. The Plant Journal. 54 (4): 684–701. doi:10.1111/j.1365-313X.2008.03431.x. PMID18476872. Strange, Amy (September 20, 2011) Scientists engineer plants to eat toxic pollution The Irish Times. Retrieved September 20, 2011 Diaz E (editor). (2008). Microbial Biodegradation: Genomics and Molecular Biology (1st ed.). Caister Academic Press. ISBN978-1-904455-17-2. James C (2011). “ISAAA Brief 43, Global Status of Commercialized Biotech/GM Crops: 2011”. ISAAA Briefs. Ithaca, New York: International Service for the Acquisition of Agri-biotech Applications (ISAAA). Retrieved June 2, 2012. GM Science Review First ReportArchived October 16, 2013, at the Wayback Machine, Prepared by the UK GM Science Review panel (July 2003). Chairman Professor Sir David King, Chief Scientific Advisor to the UK Government, P 9 James C (1996). “Global Review of the Field Testing and Commercialization of Transgenic Plants: 1986 to 1995” (PDF). The International Service for the Acquisition of Agri-biotech Applications. Retrieved July 17, 2010. “Consumer Q&A”. Fda.gov. March 6, 2009. Retrieved December 29, 2012. “AquAdvantage Salmon”. FDA. Retrieved July 20, 2018. Nicolia A, Manzo A, Veronesi F, Rosellini D (March 2014). “An overview of the last 10 years of genetically engineered crop safety research” (PDF). Critical Reviews in Biotechnology. 34 (1): 77–88. doi:10.3109/07388551.2013.823595. PMID24041244. Archived from the original (PDF) on September 17, 2016. Retrieved July 8, 2016. “State of Food and Agriculture 2003–2004. Agricultural Biotechnology: Meeting the Needs of the Poor. Health and environmental impacts of transgenic crops”. Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations. Retrieved February 8, 2016. Ronald P (May 2011). “Plant genetics, sustainable agriculture and global food security”. Genetics. 188 (1): 11–20. doi:10.1534/genetics.111.128553. PMC3120150. PMID21546547. Domingo JL, Giné Bordonaba J (May 2011). “A literature review on the safety assessment of genetically modified plants”. Environment International. 37 (4): 734–42. doi:10.1016/j.envint.2011.01.003. PMID21296423. Krimsky S (2015). “An Illusory Consensus behind GMO Health Assessment” (PDF). Science, Technology, & Human Values. 40 (6): 883–914. doi:10.1177/0162243915598381. Archived from the original (PDF) on February 7, 2016. Retrieved July 8, 2016. I began this article with the testimonials from respected scientists that there is literally no scientific controversy over the health effects of GMOs. My investigation into the scientific literature tells another story. Panchin AY, Tuzhikov AI (March 2017). “Published GMO studies find no evidence of harm when corrected for multiple comparisons”. Critical Reviews in Biotechnology. 37 (2): 213–217. doi:10.3109/07388551.2015.1130684. PMID26767435. Yang YT, Chen B (April 2016). “Governing GMOs in the USA: science, law and public health”. Journal of the Science of Food and Agriculture. 96 (6): 1851–5. doi:10.1002/jsfa.7523. PMID26536836. “Statement by the AAAS Board of Directors On Labeling of Genetically Modified Foods” (PDF). American Association for the Advancement of Science. October 20, 2012. Retrieved February 8, 2016. Pinholster G (October 25, 2012). “AAAS Board of Directors: Legally Mandating GM Food Labels Could “Mislead and Falsely Alarm Consumers””. American Association for the Advancement of Science. Retrieved February 8, 2016. A decade of EU-funded GMO research (2001–2010) (PDF). Directorate-General for Research and Innovation. Biotechnologies, Agriculture, Food. European Commission, European Union. 2010. doi:10.2777/97784. ISBN978-92-79-16344-9. Retrieved February 8, 2016. “AMA Report on Genetically Modified Crops and Foods (online summary)”. American Medical Association. January 2001. Retrieved March 19, 2016. “Report 2 of the Council on Science and Public Health (A-12): Labeling of Bioengineered Foods” (PDF). American Medical Association. 2012. Archived from the original on September 7, 2012. Retrieved March 19, 2016. “Restrictions on Genetically Modified Organisms: United States. Public and Scholarly Opinion”. Library of Congress. June 9, 2015. Retrieved February 8, 2016. Genetically Engineered Crops: Experiences and Prospects. The National Academies of Sciences, Engineering, and Medicine (US). 2016. p. 149. Retrieved May 19, 2016. “Frequently asked questions on genetically modified foods”. World Health Organization. Retrieved February 8, 2016. Haslberger AG (July 2003). “Codex guidelines for GM foods include the analysis of unintended effects”. Nature Biotechnology. 21 (7): 739–41. doi:10.1038/nbt0703-739. PMID12833088. Some medical organizations, including the British Medical Association, advocate further caution based upon the precautionary principle:

“Genetically modified foods and health: a second interim statement” (PDF). British Medical Association. March 2004. Retrieved March 21, 2016. Funk C, Rainie L (January 29, 2015). “Public and Scientists’ Views on Science and Society”. Pew Research Center. Retrieved February 24, 2016. The largest differences between the public and the AAAS scientists are found in beliefs about the safety of eating genetically modified (GM) foods. Nearly nine-in-ten (88%) scientists say it is generally safe to eat GM foods compared with 37% of the general public, a difference of 51 percentage points. Marris C (July 2001). “Public views on GMOs: deconstructing the myths. Stakeholders in the GMO debate often describe public opinion as irrational. But do they really understand the public?”. EMBO Reports. 2 (7): 545–8. doi:10.1093/embo-reports/kve142. PMC1083956. PMID11463731. Final Report of the PABE research project (December 2001). “Public Perceptions of Agricultural Biotechnologies in Europe”. Commission of European Communities. Retrieved February 24, 2016. Scott SE, Inbar Y, Rozin P (May 2016). “Evidence for Absolute Moral Opposition to Genetically Modified Food in the United States” (PDF). Perspectives on Psychological Science. 11 (3): 315–24. doi:10.1177/1745691615621275. PMID27217243. “Restrictions on Genetically Modified Organisms”. Library of Congress. June 9, 2015. Retrieved February 24, 2016. Bashshur R (February 2013). “FDA and Regulation of GMOs”. American Bar Association. Retrieved February 24, 2016. Sifferlin A (October 3, 2015). “Over Half of E.U. Countries Are Opting Out of GMOs”. Time. Lynch D, Vogel D (April 5, 2001). “The Regulation of GMOs in Europe and the United States: A Case-Study of Contemporary European Regulatory Politics”. Council on Foreign Relations. Retrieved February 24, 2016. Pollack A (April 13, 2010). “Study Says Overuse Threatens Gains From Modified Crops”. New York Times. Industrial Biotechnology and Biomass UtilisationArchived April 5, 2013, at the Wayback MachineIndustrial biotechnology, A powerful, innovative technology to mitigate climate changeDaniel A. Vallero, Environmental Biotechnology: A Biosystems Approach, Academic Press, Amsterdam, NV; ISBN978-0-12-375089-1; 2010. Gaskell G, Bauer MW, Durant J, Allum NC (July 1999). “Worlds apart? The reception of genetically modified foods in Europe and the U.S”. Science. 285 (5426): 384–7. doi:10.1126/science.285.5426.384. PMID10411496. “The History and Future of GM Potatoes”. Potato Pro. March 10, 2010. Wesseler J, Kalaitzandonakes N (2011). “Present and Future EU GMO policy”. In Oskam A, Meesters G, Silvis H (eds.). EU Policy for Agriculture, Food and Rural Areas (2nd ed.). Wageningen: Wageningen Academic Publishers. pp. 23–332. Beckmann VC, Soregaroli J, Wesseler J (2011). “Coexistence of genetically modified (GM) and non-modified (non GM) crops: Are the two main property rights regimes equivalent with respect to the coexistence value?”. In Carter C, Moschini G, Sheldon I (eds.). Genetically modified food and global welfare. Frontiers of Economics and Globalization Series. 10. Bingley, UK: Emerald Group Publishing. pp. 201–224.

  1. “Biotechnology Predoctoral Training Program”. National Institute of General Medical Sciences. December 18, 2013. Retrieved October 28, 2014.

Further reading

External links

Wikibooks has a book on the topic of: Genes, Technology and Policy
At Wikiversity, you can learn more and teach others about Biotechnology at the Department of Biotechnology
Look up biotechnology in Wiktionary, the free dictionary.
vteBiotechnology
ANOTHER FORM OF ECONOMY IS AGRICULTURE

 Help Book creator ( disable )  Remove this page from your book Show book (71 pages) Suggest pages

Biotechnology

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia Jump to navigationJump to search For other uses, see Biotechnology (disambiguation).

Insulin crystals

Biotechnology (commonly abbreviated as biotech) is the broad area of biology involving living systems and organisms to develop or make products, or “any technological application that uses biological systems, living organisms, or derivatives thereof, to make or modify products or processes for specific use” (UN Convention on Biological Diversity, Art. 2).[1] Depending on the tools and applications, it often overlaps with the (related) fields of molecular biology, bio-engineering, biomedical engineering, biomanufacturing, molecular engineering, etc.

For thousands of years, humankind has used biotechnology in agriculture, food production, and medicine.[2] The term is largely believed to have been coined in 1919 by Hungarian engineer Károly Ereky. In the late 20th and early 21st centuries, biotechnology has expanded to include new and diverse sciences such as genomics, recombinant gene techniques, applied immunology, and development of pharmaceutical therapies and diagnostic tests.[2]

Contents

Definitions

The wide concept of “biotech” or “biotechnology” encompasses a wide range of procedures for modifying living organisms according to human purposes, going back to domestication of animals, cultivation of the plants, and “improvements” to these through breeding programs that employ artificial selection and hybridization. Modern usage also includes genetic engineering as well as cell and tissue culture technologies. The American Chemical Society defines biotechnology as the application of biological organisms, systems, or processes by various industries to learning about the science of life and the improvement of the value of materials and organisms such as pharmaceuticals, crops, and livestock.[3] Per the European Federation of Biotechnology, biotechnology is the integration of natural science and organisms, cells, parts thereof, and molecular analogues for products and services.[4] Biotechnology is based on the basic biological sciences (e.g. molecular biology, biochemistry, cell biology, embryology, genetics, microbiology) and conversely provides methods to support and perform basic research in biology.

Biotechnology is the research and development in the laboratory using bioinformatics for exploration, extraction, exploitation and production from any living organisms and any source of biomass by means of biochemical engineering where high value-added products could be planned (reproduced by biosynthesis, for example), forecasted, formulated, developed, manufactured, and marketed for the purpose of sustainable operations (for the return from bottomless initial investment on R & D) and gaining durable patents rights (for exclusives rights for sales, and prior to this to receive national and international approval from the results on animal experiment and human experiment, especially on the pharmaceutical branch of biotechnology to prevent any undetected side-effects or safety concerns by using the products).[5][6][7] The utilization of biological processes, organisms or systems to produce products that are anticipated to improve human lives is termed biotechnology.[8]

By contrast, bioengineering is generally thought of as a related field that more heavily emphasizes higher systems approaches (not necessarily the altering or using of biological materials directly) for interfacing with and utilizing living things. Bioengineering is the application of the principles of engineering and natural sciences to tissues, cells and molecules. This can be considered as the use of knowledge from working with and manipulating biology to achieve a result that can improve functions in plants and animals.[9] Relatedly, biomedical engineering is an overlapping field that often draws upon and applies biotechnology (by various definitions), especially in certain sub-fields of biomedical or chemical engineering such as tissue engineering, biopharmaceutical engineering, and genetic engineering.

History

Brewing was an early application of biotechnology Main article: History of biotechnology

Although not normally what first comes to mind, many forms of human-derived agriculture clearly fit the broad definition of “‘utilizing a biotechnological system to make products”. Indeed, the cultivation of plants may be viewed as the earliest biotechnological enterprise.

Agriculture has been theorized to have become the dominant way of producing food since the Neolithic Revolution. Through early biotechnology, the earliest farmers selected and bred the best suited crops, having the highest yields, to produce enough food to support a growing population. As crops and fields became increasingly large and difficult to maintain, it was discovered that specific organisms and their by-products could effectively fertilize, restore nitrogen, and control pests. Throughout the history of agriculture, farmers have inadvertently altered the genetics of their crops through introducing them to new environments and breeding them with other plants — one of the first forms of biotechnology.

These processes also were included in early fermentation of beer.[10] These processes were introduced in early Mesopotamia, Egypt, China and India, and still use the same basic biological methods. In brewing, malted grains (containing enzymes) convert starch from grains into sugar and then adding specific yeasts to produce beer. In this process, carbohydrates in the grains broke down into alcohols, such as ethanol. Later, other cultures produced the process of lactic acid fermentation, which produced other preserved foods, such as soy sauce. Fermentation was also used in this time period to produce leavened bread. Although the process of fermentation was not fully understood until Louis Pasteur‘s work in 1857, it is still the first use of biotechnology to convert a food source into another form.

Before the time of Charles Darwin‘s work and life, animal and plant scientists had already used selective breeding. Darwin added to that body of work with his scientific observations about the ability of science to change species. These accounts contributed to Darwin’s theory of natural selection.[11]

For thousands of years, humans have used selective breeding to improve production of crops and livestock to use them for food. In selective breeding, organisms with desirable characteristics are mated to produce offspring with the same characteristics. For example, this technique was used with corn to produce the largest and sweetest crops.[12]

In the early twentieth century scientists gained a greater understanding of microbiology and explored ways of manufacturing specific products. In 1917, Chaim Weizmann first used a pure microbiological culture in an industrial process, that of manufacturing corn starch using Clostridium acetobutylicum, to produce acetone, which the United Kingdom desperately needed to manufacture explosives during World War I.[13]

Biotechnology has also led to the development of antibiotics. In 1928, Alexander Fleming discovered the mold Penicillium. His work led to the purification of the antibiotic compound formed by the mold by Howard Florey, Ernst Boris Chain and Norman Heatley – to form what we today know as penicillin. In 1940, penicillin became available for medicinal use to treat bacterial infections in humans.[12]

The field of modern biotechnology is generally thought of as having been born in 1971 when Paul Berg’s (Stanford) experiments in gene splicing had early success. Herbert W. Boyer (Univ. Calif. at San Francisco) and Stanley N. Cohen (Stanford) significantly advanced the new technology in 1972 by transferring genetic material into a bacterium, such that the imported material would be reproduced. The commercial viability of a biotechnology industry was significantly expanded on June 16, 1980, when the United States Supreme Court ruled that a genetically modified microorganism could be patented in the case of Diamond v. Chakrabarty.[14] Indian-born Ananda Chakrabarty, working for General Electric, had modified a bacterium (of the genus Pseudomonas) capable of breaking down crude oil, which he proposed to use in treating oil spills. (Chakrabarty’s work did not involve gene manipulation but rather the transfer of entire organelles between strains of the Pseudomonas bacterium.

Revenue in the industry is expected to grow by 12.9% in 2008.

This section needs to be updated. Please update this article to reflect recent events or newly available information. (October 2018)

Another factor influencing the biotechnology sector’s success is improved intellectual property rights legislation—and enforcement—worldwide, as well as strengthened demand for medical and pharmaceutical products to cope with an ageing, and ailing, U.S. population.[15]

Rising demand for biofuels is expected to be good news for the biotechnology sector, with the Department of Energy estimating ethanol usage could reduce U.S. petroleum-derived fuel consumption by up to 30% by 2030. The biotechnology sector has allowed the U.S. farming industry to rapidly increase its supply of corn and soybeans—the main inputs into biofuels—by developing genetically modified seeds that resist pests and drought. By increasing farm productivity, biotechnology boosts biofuel production.[16]

Examples

A rose plant that began as cells grown in a tissue culture

Biotechnology has applications in four major industrial areas, including health care (medical), crop production and agriculture, non-food (industrial) uses of crops and other products (e.g. biodegradable plastics, vegetable oil, biofuels, and environmental uses).

For example, one application of biotechnology is the directed use of microorganisms for the manufacture of organic products (examples include beer and milk products). Another example is using naturally present bacteria by the mining industry in bioleaching. Biotechnology is also used to recycle, treat waste, clean up sites contaminated by industrial activities (bioremediation), and also to produce biological weapons.

A series of derived terms have been coined to identify several branches of biotechnology, for example:

  • Bioinformatics (also called “gold biotechnology”) is an interdisciplinary field that addresses biological problems using computational techniques, and makes the rapid organization as well as analysis of biological data possible. The field may also be referred to as computational biology, and can be defined as, “conceptualizing biology in terms of molecules and then applying informatics techniques to understand and organize the information associated with these molecules, on a large scale.”[17] Bioinformatics plays a key role in various areas, such as functional genomics, structural genomics, and proteomics, and forms a key component in the biotechnology and pharmaceutical sector.[18]
  • Blue biotechnology is based on the exploitation of sea resources to create products and industrial applications.[19] This branch of biotechnology is the most used for the industries of refining and combustion principally on the production of bio-oils with photosynthetic micro-algae.[19][20]
  • Green biotechnology is biotechnology applied to agricultural processes. An example would be the selection and domestication of plants via micropropagation. Another example is the designing of transgenic plants to grow under specific environments in the presence (or absence) of chemicals. One hope is that green biotechnology might produce more environmentally friendly solutions than traditional industrial agriculture. An example of this is the engineering of a plant to express a pesticide, thereby ending the need of external application of pesticides. An example of this would be Bt corn. Whether or not green biotechnology products such as this are ultimately more environmentally friendly is a topic of considerable debate.[19] It is commonly considered as the next phase of green revolution, which can be seen as a platform to eradicate world hunger by using technologies which enable the production of more fertile and resistant, towards biotic and abiotic stress, plants and ensures application of environmentally friendly fertilizers and the use of biopesticides, it is mainly focused on the development of agriculture.[19] On the other hand, some of the uses of green biotechnology involve microorganisms to clean and reduce waste.[21][19]
  • Red biotechnology is the use of biotechnology in the medical and pharmaceutical industries, and health preservation.[19] This branch involves the production of vaccines and antibiotics, regenerative therapies, creation of artificial organs and new diagnostics of diseases.[19] As well as the development of hormones, stem cells, antibodies, siRNA and diagnostic tests.[19]
  • White biotechnology, also known as industrial biotechnology, is biotechnology applied to industrial processes. An example is the designing of an organism to produce a useful chemical. Another example is the using of enzymes as industrial catalysts to either produce valuable chemicals or destroy hazardous/polluting chemicals. White biotechnology tends to consume less in resources than traditional processes used to produce industrial goods.[22][23]
  • “Yellow biotechnology” refers to the use of biotechnology in food production, for example in making wine, cheese, and beer by fermentation.[19] It has also been used to refer to biotechnology applied to insects. This includes biotechnology-based approaches for the control of harmful insects, the characterisation and utilisation of active ingredients or genes of insects for research, or application in agriculture and medicine and various other approaches.[24]
  • Gray biotechnology is dedicated to environmental applications, and focused on the maintenance of biodiversity and the remotion of pollutants.[19]
  • Brown biotechnology is related to the management of arid lands and deserts. One application is the creation of enhanced seeds that resist extreme environmental conditions of arid regions, which is related to the innovation, creation of agriculture techniques and management of resources.[19]
  • Violet biotechnology is related to law, ethical and philosophical issues around biotechnology.[19]
  • Dark biotechnology is the color associated with bioterrorism or biological weapons and biowarfare which uses microorganisms, and toxins to cause diseases and death in humans, livestock and crops.[25][19]

Medicine

In medicine, modern biotechnology has many applications in areas such as pharmaceutical drug discoveries and production, pharmacogenomics, and genetic testing (or genetic screening).

DNA microarray chip – some can do as many as a million blood tests at once

Pharmacogenomics (a combination of pharmacology and genomics) is the technology that analyses how genetic makeup affects an individual’s response to drugs.[26] Researchers in the field investigate the influence of genetic variation on drug responses in patients by correlating gene expression or single-nucleotide polymorphisms with a drug’s efficacy or toxicity.[27] The purpose of pharmacogenomics is to develop rational means to optimize drug therapy, with respect to the patients’ genotype, to ensure maximum efficacy with minimal adverse effects.[28] Such approaches promise the advent of “personalized medicine“; in which drugs and drug combinations are optimized for each individual’s unique genetic makeup.[29][30]

Computer-generated image of insulin hexamers highlighting the threefold symmetry, the zinc ions holding it together, and the histidine residues involved in zinc binding.

Biotechnology has contributed to the discovery and manufacturing of traditional small molecule pharmaceutical drugs as well as drugs that are the product of biotechnology – biopharmaceutics. Modern biotechnology can be used to manufacture existing medicines relatively easily and cheaply. The first genetically engineered products were medicines designed to treat human diseases. To cite one example, in 1978 Genentech developed synthetic humanized insulin by joining its gene with a plasmid vector inserted into the bacterium Escherichia coli. Insulin, widely used for the treatment of diabetes, was previously extracted from the pancreas of abattoir animals (cattle or pigs). The genetically engineered bacteria are able to produce large quantities of synthetic human insulin at relatively low cost.[31][32] Biotechnology has also enabled emerging therapeutics like gene therapy. The application of biotechnology to basic science (for example through the Human Genome Project) has also dramatically improved our understanding of biology and as our scientific knowledge of normal and disease biology has increased, our ability to develop new medicines to treat previously untreatable diseases has increased as well.[32]

Genetic testing allows the genetic diagnosis of vulnerabilities to inherited diseases, and can also be used to determine a child’s parentage (genetic mother and father) or in general a person’s ancestry. In addition to studying chromosomes to the level of individual genes, genetic testing in a broader sense includes biochemical tests for the possible presence of genetic diseases, or mutant forms of genes associated with increased risk of developing genetic disorders. Genetic testing identifies changes in chromosomes, genes, or proteins.[33] Most of the time, testing is used to find changes that are associated with inherited disorders. The results of a genetic test can confirm or rule out a suspected genetic condition or help determine a person’s chance of developing or passing on a genetic disorder. As of 2011 several hundred genetic tests were in use.[34][35] Since genetic testing may open up ethical or psychological problems, genetic testing is often accompanied by genetic counseling.

Agriculture

Genetically modified crops (“GM crops”, or “biotech crops”) are plants used in agriculture, the DNA of which has been modified with genetic engineering techniques. In most cases, the main aim is to introduce a new trait that does not occur naturally in the species. Biotechnology firms can contribute to future food security by improving the nutrition and viability of urban agriculture. Furthermore, the protection of intellectual property rights encourages private sector investment in agrobiotechnology. For example, in Illinois FARM Illinois (Food and Agriculture RoadMap for Illinois) is an initiative to develop and coordinate farmers, industry, research institutions, government, and nonprofits in pursuit of food and agriculture innovation. In addition, the Illinois Biotechnology Industry Organization (iBIO) is a life sciences industry association with more than 500 life sciences companies, universities, academic institutions, service providers and others as members. The association describes its members as “dedicated to making Illinois and the surrounding Midwest one of the world’s top life sciences centers.”[36]

Examples in food crops include resistance to certain pests,[37] diseases,[38] stressful environmental conditions,[39] resistance to chemical treatments (e.g. resistance to a herbicide[40]), reduction of spoilage,[41] or improving the nutrient profile of the crop.[42] Examples in non-food crops include production of pharmaceutical agents,[43] biofuels,[44] and other industrially useful goods,[45] as well as for bioremediation.[46][47]

Farmers have widely adopted GM technology. Between 1996 and 2011, the total surface area of land cultivated with GM crops had increased by a factor of 94, from 17,000 square kilometers (4,200,000 acres) to 1,600,000 km2 (395 million acres).[48] 10% of the world’s crop lands were planted with GM crops in 2010.[48] As of 2011, 11 different transgenic crops were grown commercially on 395 million acres (160 million hectares) in 29 countries such as the US, Brazil, Argentina, India, Canada, China, Paraguay, Pakistan, South Africa, Uruguay, Bolivia, Australia, Philippines, Myanmar, Burkina Faso, Mexico and Spain.[48]

Genetically modified foods are foods produced from organisms that have had specific changes introduced into their DNA with the methods of genetic engineering. These techniques have allowed for the introduction of new crop traits as well as a far greater control over a food’s genetic structure than previously afforded by methods such as selective breeding and mutation breeding.[49] Commercial sale of genetically modified foods began in 1994, when Calgene first marketed its Flavr Savr delayed ripening tomato.[50] To date most genetic modification of foods have primarily focused on cash crops in high demand by farmers such as soybean, corn, canola, and cotton seed oil. These have been engineered for resistance to pathogens and herbicides and better nutrient profiles. GM livestock have also been experimentally developed; in November 2013 none were available on the market,[51] but in 2015 the FDA approved the first GM salmon for commercial production and consumption.[52]

There is a scientific consensus[53][54][55][56][57][58][59] that currently available food derived from GM crops poses no greater risk to human health than conventional food,[60][61][62][63][64][65][66] but that each GM food must be tested on a case-by-case basis before introduction.[67][68][69] Nonetheless, members of the public are much less likely than scientists to perceive GM foods as safe.[70][71][72][73] The legal and regulatory status of GM foods varies by country, with some nations banning or restricting them, and others permitting them with widely differing degrees of regulation.[74][75][76][77]

GM crops also provide a number of ecological benefits, if not used in excess.[78] However, opponents have objected to GM crops per se on several grounds, including environmental concerns, whether food produced from GM crops is safe, whether GM crops are needed to address the world’s food needs, and economic concerns raised by the fact these organisms are subject to intellectual property law.

Industrial

Industrial biotechnology (known mainly in Europe as white biotechnology) is the application of biotechnology for industrial purposes, including industrial fermentation. It includes the practice of using cells such as microorganisms, or components of cells like enzymes, to generate industrially useful products in sectors such as chemicals, food and feed, detergents, paper and pulp, textiles and biofuels.[79] In the current decades, significant progress has been done in creating genetically modified organisms (GMOs) that enhance the diversity of applications and economical viability of industrial biotechnology. By using renewable raw materials to produce a variety of chemicals and fuels, industrial biotechnology is actively advancing towards lowering greenhouse gas emissions and moving away from a petrochemical-based economy.[80]

Environmental

The environment can be affected by biotechnologies, both positively and adversely. Vallero and others have argued that the difference between beneficial biotechnology (e.g.bioremediation is to clean up an oil spill or hazard chemical leak) versus the adverse effects stemming from biotechnological enterprises (e.g. flow of genetic material from transgenic organisms into wild strains) can be seen as applications and implications, respectively.[81] Cleaning up environmental wastes is an example of an application of environmental biotechnology; whereas loss of biodiversity or loss of containment of a harmful microbe are examples of environmental implications of biotechnology.

Regulation

Main articles: Regulation of genetic engineering and Regulation of the release of genetic modified organisms

The regulation of genetic engineering concerns approaches taken by governments to assess and manage the risks associated with the use of genetic engineering technology, and the development and release of genetically modified organisms (GMO), including genetically modified crops and genetically modified fish. There are differences in the regulation of GMOs between countries, with some of the most marked differences occurring between the USA and Europe.[82] Regulation varies in a given country depending on the intended use of the products of the genetic engineering. For example, a crop not intended for food use is generally not reviewed by authorities responsible for food safety.[83] The European Union differentiates between approval for cultivation within the EU and approval for import and processing. While only a few GMOs have been approved for cultivation in the EU a number of GMOs have been approved for import and processing.[84] The cultivation of GMOs has triggered a debate about coexistence of GM and non GM crops. Depending on the coexistence regulations, incentives for cultivation of GM crops differ.[85]

Learning

In 1988, after prompting from the United States Congress, the National Institute of General Medical Sciences (National Institutes of Health) (NIGMS) instituted a funding mechanism for biotechnology training. Universities nationwide compete for these funds to establish Biotechnology Training Programs (BTPs). Each successful application is generally funded for five years then must be competitively renewed. Graduate students in turn compete for acceptance into a BTP; if accepted, then stipend, tuition and health insurance support is provided for two or three years during the course of their Ph.D. thesis work. Nineteen institutions offer NIGMS supported BTPs.[86] Biotechnology training is also offered at the undergraduate level and in community colleges.

See also

References and notes

Text of the CBD. CBD.int. Retrieved on March 20, 2013. “Incorporating Biotechnology into the Classroom What is Biotechnology?”, from the curricula of the ‘Incorporating Biotechnology into the High School Classroom through Arizona State University’s BioREACH program’, accessed on October 16, 2012). Public.asu.edu. Retrieved on March 20, 2013. BiotechnologyArchived November 7, 2012, at the Wayback Machine. Portal.acs.org. Retrieved on March 20, 2013. “Archived copy” (PDF). Archived from the original (PDF) on August 7, 2015. Retrieved December 29, 2014. What is biotechnology?. Europabio. Retrieved on March 20, 2013. Key Biotechnology Indicators (December 2011). oecd.org Biotechnology policies – Organization for Economic Co-operation and Development. Oecd.org. Retrieved on March 20, 2013. “History, scope and development of biotechnology”. iopscience.iop.org. Retrieved October 30, 2018. What Is Bioengineering?Archived January 23, 2013, at the Wayback Machine. Bionewsonline.com. Retrieved on March 20, 2013. See Arnold JP (2005). Origin and History of Beer and Brewing: From Prehistoric Times to the Beginning of Brewing Science and Technology. Cleveland, Ohio: BeerBooks. p. 34. ISBN978-0-9662084-1-2. OCLC71834130.. Cole-Turner R (2003). “Biotechnology”. Encyclopedia of Science and Religion. Retrieved December 7, 2014. Thieman WJ, Palladino MA (2008). Introduction to Biotechnology. Pearson/Benjamin Cummings. ISBN978-0-321-49145-9. Springham D, Springham G, Moses V, Cape RE (1999). Biotechnology: The Science and the Business. CRC Press. p. 1. ISBN978-90-5702-407-8. “Diamond v. Chakrabarty, 447 U.S. 303 (1980). No. 79-139.” United States Supreme Court. June 16, 1980. Retrieved on May 4, 2007. VoIP Providers And Corn Farmers Can Expect To Have Bumper Years In 2008 And Beyond, According To The Latest Research Released By Business Information Analysts At IBISWorld. Los Angeles (March 19, 2008) The Recession List — Top 10 Industries to Fly and Fl… (ith anincreasing share accounted for by …), bio-medicine.org Gerstein, M. “Bioinformatics IntroductionArchived 2007-06-16 at the Wayback Machine.” Yale University. Retrieved on May 8, 2007. Siam, R. (2009). Biotechnology Research and Development in Academia: providing the foundation for Egypt’s Biotechnology spectrum of colors. Sixteenth Annual American University in Cairo Research Conference, American University in Cairo, Cairo, Egypt. BMC Proceedings, 31–35. Kafarski, P. (2012). Rainbow Code of Biotechnology. CHEMIK. Wroclaw University Biotech: true colours. (2009). TCE: The Chemical Engineer, (816), 26–31. Aldridge, S. (2009). The four colours of biotechnology: the biotechnology sector is occasionally described as a rainbow, with each sub sector having its own colour. But what do the different colours of biotechnology have to offer the pharmaceutical industry?. Pharmaceutical Technology Europe, (1). 12. Frazzetto G (September 2003). “White biotechnology”. EMBO Reports. 4 (9): 835–7. doi:10.1038/sj.embor.embor928. PMC1326365. PMID12949582. Frazzetto, G. (2003). White biotechnology. 21/03/2017, de EMBOpress Sitio Advances in Biochemical Engineering/Biotechnology, Volume 135 2013, Yellow Biotechnology I Edgar, J.D. (2004). The Colours of Biotechnology: Science, Development and Humankind. Electronic Journal of Biotechnology, (3), 01 Ermak G. (2013) Modern Science & Future Medicine (second edition) Wang L (2010). “Pharmacogenomics: a systems approach”. Wiley Interdisciplinary Reviews: Systems Biology and Medicine. 2 (1): 3–22. doi:10.1002/wsbm.42. PMC3894835. PMID20836007. Becquemont L (June 2009). “Pharmacogenomics of adverse drug reactions: practical applications and perspectives”. Pharmacogenomics. 10 (6): 961–9. doi:10.2217/pgs.09.37. PMID19530963. “Guidance for Industry Pharmacogenomic Data Submissions” (PDF). U.S. Food and Drug Administration. March 2005. Retrieved August 27, 2008. Squassina A, Manchia M, Manolopoulos VG, Artac M, Lappa-Manakou C, Karkabouna S, Mitropoulos K, Del Zompo M, Patrinos GP (August 2010). “Realities and expectations of pharmacogenomics and personalized medicine: impact of translating genetic knowledge into clinical practice”. Pharmacogenomics. 11 (8): 1149–67. doi:10.2217/pgs.10.97. PMID20712531. Bains W (1987). Genetic Engineering For Almost Everybody: What Does It Do? What Will It Do?. Penguin. p. 99. ISBN978-0-14-013501-5. U.S. Department of State International Information Programs, “Frequently Asked Questions About Biotechnology”, USIS Online; available from USinfo.state.govArchived September 12, 2007, at the Wayback Machine, accessed September 13, 2007. Cf. Feldbaum C (February 2002). “Biotechnology. Some history should be repeated”. Science. 295 (5557): 975. doi:10.1126/science.1069614. PMID11834802. “What is genetic testing? – Genetics Home Reference”. Ghr.nlm.nih.gov. May 30, 2011. Retrieved June 7, 2011. “Genetic Testing: MedlinePlus”. Nlm.nih.gov. Retrieved June 7, 2011. “Definitions of Genetic Testing”. Definitions of Genetic Testing (Jorge Sequeiros and Bárbara Guimarães). EuroGentest Network of Excellence Project. September 11, 2008. Archived from the original on February 4, 2009. Retrieved August 10, 2008. Mazany, Terry (May 19, 2015). “A FOOD AND AGRICULTURE ROADMAP FOR ILLINOIS” (PDF). learnbioscience.com/blog. Genetically Altered Potato Ok’d For Crops Lawrence Journal-World – May 6, 1995 National Academy of Sciences (2001). Transgenic Plants and World Agriculture. Washington: National Academy Press. Paarlburg R (January 2011). “Drought Tolerant GMO Maize in Africa, Anticipating Regulatory Hurdles” (PDF). International Life Sciences Institute. Archived from the original (PDF) on December 22, 2014. Retrieved April 25, 2011. Carpenter J. & Gianessi L. (1999). Herbicide tolerant soybeans: Why growers are adopting Roundup Ready varieties. AgBioForum, 2(2), 65–72. Haroldsen VM, Paulino G, Chi-ham C, Bennett AB (2012). “Research and adoption of biotechnology strategies could improve California fruit and nut crops” (PDF). California Agriculture. 66 (2): 62–69. doi:10.3733/ca.v066n02p62. Archived from the original (PDF) on May 11, 2013. About Golden RiceArchived November 2, 2012, at the Wayback Machine. Irri.org. Retrieved on March 20, 2013. Gali Weinreb and Koby Yeshayahou for Globes May 2, 2012. FDA approves Protalix Gaucher treatmentArchived May 29, 2013, at the Wayback Machine Carrington, Damien (January 19, 2012) GM microbe breakthrough paves way for large-scale seaweed farming for biofuels The Guardian. Retrieved March 12, 2012 van Beilen JB, Poirier Y (May 2008). “Production of renewable polymers from crop plants”. The Plant Journal. 54 (4): 684–701. doi:10.1111/j.1365-313X.2008.03431.x. PMID18476872. Strange, Amy (September 20, 2011) Scientists engineer plants to eat toxic pollution The Irish Times. Retrieved September 20, 2011 Diaz E (editor). (2008). Microbial Biodegradation: Genomics and Molecular Biology (1st ed.). Caister Academic Press. ISBN978-1-904455-17-2. James C (2011). “ISAAA Brief 43, Global Status of Commercialized Biotech/GM Crops: 2011”. ISAAA Briefs. Ithaca, New York: International Service for the Acquisition of Agri-biotech Applications (ISAAA). Retrieved June 2, 2012. GM Science Review First ReportArchived October 16, 2013, at the Wayback Machine, Prepared by the UK GM Science Review panel (July 2003). Chairman Professor Sir David King, Chief Scientific Advisor to the UK Government, P 9 James C (1996). “Global Review of the Field Testing and Commercialization of Transgenic Plants: 1986 to 1995” (PDF). The International Service for the Acquisition of Agri-biotech Applications. Retrieved July 17, 2010. “Consumer Q&A”. Fda.gov. March 6, 2009. Retrieved December 29, 2012. “AquAdvantage Salmon”. FDA. Retrieved July 20, 2018. Nicolia A, Manzo A, Veronesi F, Rosellini D (March 2014). “An overview of the last 10 years of genetically engineered crop safety research” (PDF). Critical Reviews in Biotechnology. 34 (1): 77–88. doi:10.3109/07388551.2013.823595. PMID24041244. Archived from the original (PDF) on September 17, 2016. Retrieved July 8, 2016. “State of Food and Agriculture 2003–2004. Agricultural Biotechnology: Meeting the Needs of the Poor. Health and environmental impacts of transgenic crops”. Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations. Retrieved February 8, 2016. Ronald P (May 2011). “Plant genetics, sustainable agriculture and global food security”. Genetics. 188 (1): 11–20. doi:10.1534/genetics.111.128553. PMC3120150. PMID21546547. Domingo JL, Giné Bordonaba J (May 2011). “A literature review on the safety assessment of genetically modified plants”. Environment International. 37 (4): 734–42. doi:10.1016/j.envint.2011.01.003. PMID21296423. Krimsky S (2015). “An Illusory Consensus behind GMO Health Assessment” (PDF). Science, Technology, & Human Values. 40 (6): 883–914. doi:10.1177/0162243915598381. Archived from the original (PDF) on February 7, 2016. Retrieved July 8, 2016. I began this article with the testimonials from respected scientists that there is literally no scientific controversy over the health effects of GMOs. My investigation into the scientific literature tells another story. Panchin AY, Tuzhikov AI (March 2017). “Published GMO studies find no evidence of harm when corrected for multiple comparisons”. Critical Reviews in Biotechnology. 37 (2): 213–217. doi:10.3109/07388551.2015.1130684. PMID26767435. Yang YT, Chen B (April 2016). “Governing GMOs in the USA: science, law and public health”. Journal of the Science of Food and Agriculture. 96 (6): 1851–5. doi:10.1002/jsfa.7523. PMID26536836. “Statement by the AAAS Board of Directors On Labeling of Genetically Modified Foods” (PDF). American Association for the Advancement of Science. October 20, 2012. Retrieved February 8, 2016. Pinholster G (October 25, 2012). “AAAS Board of Directors: Legally Mandating GM Food Labels Could “Mislead and Falsely Alarm Consumers””. American Association for the Advancement of Science. Retrieved February 8, 2016. A decade of EU-funded GMO research (2001–2010) (PDF). Directorate-General for Research and Innovation. Biotechnologies, Agriculture, Food. European Commission, European Union. 2010. doi:10.2777/97784. ISBN978-92-79-16344-9. Retrieved February 8, 2016. “AMA Report on Genetically Modified Crops and Foods (online summary)”. American Medical Association. January 2001. Retrieved March 19, 2016. “Report 2 of the Council on Science and Public Health (A-12): Labeling of Bioengineered Foods” (PDF). American Medical Association. 2012. Archived from the original on September 7, 2012. Retrieved March 19, 2016. “Restrictions on Genetically Modified Organisms: United States. Public and Scholarly Opinion”. Library of Congress. June 9, 2015. Retrieved February 8, 2016. Genetically Engineered Crops: Experiences and Prospects. The National Academies of Sciences, Engineering, and Medicine (US). 2016. p. 149. Retrieved May 19, 2016. “Frequently asked questions on genetically modified foods”. World Health Organization. Retrieved February 8, 2016. Haslberger AG (July 2003). “Codex guidelines for GM foods include the analysis of unintended effects”. Nature Biotechnology. 21 (7): 739–41. doi:10.1038/nbt0703-739. PMID12833088. Some medical organizations, including the British Medical Association, advocate further caution based upon the precautionary principle:

“Genetically modified foods and health: a second interim statement” (PDF). British Medical Association. March 2004. Retrieved March 21, 2016. Funk C, Rainie L (January 29, 2015). “Public and Scientists’ Views on Science and Society”. Pew Research Center. Retrieved February 24, 2016. The largest differences between the public and the AAAS scientists are found in beliefs about the safety of eating genetically modified (GM) foods. Nearly nine-in-ten (88%) scientists say it is generally safe to eat GM foods compared with 37% of the general public, a difference of 51 percentage points. Marris C (July 2001). “Public views on GMOs: deconstructing the myths. Stakeholders in the GMO debate often describe public opinion as irrational. But do they really understand the public?”. EMBO Reports. 2 (7): 545–8. doi:10.1093/embo-reports/kve142. PMC1083956. PMID11463731. Final Report of the PABE research project (December 2001). “Public Perceptions of Agricultural Biotechnologies in Europe”. Commission of European Communities. Retrieved February 24, 2016. Scott SE, Inbar Y, Rozin P (May 2016). “Evidence for Absolute Moral Opposition to Genetically Modified Food in the United States” (PDF). Perspectives on Psychological Science. 11 (3): 315–24. doi:10.1177/1745691615621275. PMID27217243. “Restrictions on Genetically Modified Organisms”. Library of Congress. June 9, 2015. Retrieved February 24, 2016. Bashshur R (February 2013). “FDA and Regulation of GMOs”. American Bar Association. Retrieved February 24, 2016. Sifferlin A (October 3, 2015). “Over Half of E.U. Countries Are Opting Out of GMOs”. Time. Lynch D, Vogel D (April 5, 2001). “The Regulation of GMOs in Europe and the United States: A Case-Study of Contemporary European Regulatory Politics”. Council on Foreign Relations. Retrieved February 24, 2016. Pollack A (April 13, 2010). “Study Says Overuse Threatens Gains From Modified Crops”. New York Times. Industrial Biotechnology and Biomass UtilisationArchived April 5, 2013, at the Wayback MachineIndustrial biotechnology, A powerful, innovative technology to mitigate climate changeDaniel A. Vallero, Environmental Biotechnology: A Biosystems Approach, Academic Press, Amsterdam, NV; ISBN978-0-12-375089-1; 2010. Gaskell G, Bauer MW, Durant J, Allum NC (July 1999). “Worlds apart? The reception of genetically modified foods in Europe and the U.S”. Science. 285 (5426): 384–7. doi:10.1126/science.285.5426.384. PMID10411496. “The History and Future of GM Potatoes”. Potato Pro. March 10, 2010. Wesseler J, Kalaitzandonakes N (2011). “Present and Future EU GMO policy”. In Oskam A, Meesters G, Silvis H (eds.). EU Policy for Agriculture, Food and Rural Areas (2nd ed.). Wageningen: Wageningen Academic Publishers. pp. 23–332. Beckmann VC, Soregaroli J, Wesseler J (2011). “Coexistence of genetically modified (GM) and non-modified (non GM) crops: Are the two main property rights regimes equivalent with respect to the coexistence value?”. In Carter C, Moschini G, Sheldon I (eds.). Genetically modified food and global welfare. Frontiers of Economics and Globalization Series. 10. Bingley, UK: Emerald Group Publishing. pp. 201–224.

  1. “Biotechnology Predoctoral Training Program”. National Institute of General Medical Sciences. December 18, 2013. Retrieved October 28, 2014.

Further reading

External links

Wikibooks has a book on the topic of: Genes, Technology and Policy
At Wikiversity, you can learn more and teach others about Biotechnology at the Department of Biotechnology
Look up biotechnology in Wiktionary, the free dictionary.
vteBiotechnology
vteTopics related to biology
Authority control GND: 4069491-4 HDS: 26223 LCCN: sh85014263 NDL: 00570270

Categories:

Navigation menu

Search

Interaction

Tools

In other projects

Print/export

Languages

Edit links

 Help Book creator ( disable )  Remove this page from your book Show book (71 pages) Suggest pages

Biotechnology

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia Jump to navigationJump to search For other uses, see Biotechnology (disambiguation).

Insulin crystals

Biotechnology (commonly abbreviated as biotech) is the broad area of biology involving living systems and organisms to develop or make products, or “any technological application that uses biological systems, living organisms, or derivatives thereof, to make or modify products or processes for specific use” (UN Convention on Biological Diversity, Art. 2).[1] Depending on the tools and applications, it often overlaps with the (related) fields of molecular biology, bio-engineering, biomedical engineering, biomanufacturing, molecular engineering, etc.

For thousands of years, humankind has used biotechnology in agriculture, food production, and medicine.[2] The term is largely believed to have been coined in 1919 by Hungarian engineer Károly Ereky. In the late 20th and early 21st centuries, biotechnology has expanded to include new and diverse sciences such as genomics, recombinant gene techniques, applied immunology, and development of pharmaceutical therapies and diagnostic tests.[2]

Contents

Definitions

The wide concept of “biotech” or “biotechnology” encompasses a wide range of procedures for modifying living organisms according to human purposes, going back to domestication of animals, cultivation of the plants, and “improvements” to these through breeding programs that employ artificial selection and hybridization. Modern usage also includes genetic engineering as well as cell and tissue culture technologies. The American Chemical Society defines biotechnology as the application of biological organisms, systems, or processes by various industries to learning about the science of life and the improvement of the value of materials and organisms such as pharmaceuticals, crops, and livestock.[3] Per the European Federation of Biotechnology, biotechnology is the integration of natural science and organisms, cells, parts thereof, and molecular analogues for products and services.[4] Biotechnology is based on the basic biological sciences (e.g. molecular biology, biochemistry, cell biology, embryology, genetics, microbiology) and conversely provides methods to support and perform basic research in biology.

Biotechnology is the research and development in the laboratory using bioinformatics for exploration, extraction, exploitation and production from any living organisms and any source of biomass by means of biochemical engineering where high value-added products could be planned (reproduced by biosynthesis, for example), forecasted, formulated, developed, manufactured, and marketed for the purpose of sustainable operations (for the return from bottomless initial investment on R & D) and gaining durable patents rights (for exclusives rights for sales, and prior to this to receive national and international approval from the results on animal experiment and human experiment, especially on the pharmaceutical branch of biotechnology to prevent any undetected side-effects or safety concerns by using the products).[5][6][7] The utilization of biological processes, organisms or systems to produce products that are anticipated to improve human lives is termed biotechnology.[8]

By contrast, bioengineering is generally thought of as a related field that more heavily emphasizes higher systems approaches (not necessarily the altering or using of biological materials directly) for interfacing with and utilizing living things. Bioengineering is the application of the principles of engineering and natural sciences to tissues, cells and molecules. This can be considered as the use of knowledge from working with and manipulating biology to achieve a result that can improve functions in plants and animals.[9] Relatedly, biomedical engineering is an overlapping field that often draws upon and applies biotechnology (by various definitions), especially in certain sub-fields of biomedical or chemical engineering such as tissue engineering, biopharmaceutical engineering, and genetic engineering.

History

Brewing was an early application of biotechnology Main article: History of biotechnology

Although not normally what first comes to mind, many forms of human-derived agriculture clearly fit the broad definition of “‘utilizing a biotechnological system to make products”. Indeed, the cultivation of plants may be viewed as the earliest biotechnological enterprise.

Agriculture has been theorized to have become the dominant way of producing food since the Neolithic Revolution. Through early biotechnology, the earliest farmers selected and bred the best suited crops, having the highest yields, to produce enough food to support a growing population. As crops and fields became increasingly large and difficult to maintain, it was discovered that specific organisms and their by-products could effectively fertilize, restore nitrogen, and control pests. Throughout the history of agriculture, farmers have inadvertently altered the genetics of their crops through introducing them to new environments and breeding them with other plants — one of the first forms of biotechnology.

These processes also were included in early fermentation of beer.[10] These processes were introduced in early Mesopotamia, Egypt, China and India, and still use the same basic biological methods. In brewing, malted grains (containing enzymes) convert starch from grains into sugar and then adding specific yeasts to produce beer. In this process, carbohydrates in the grains broke down into alcohols, such as ethanol. Later, other cultures produced the process of lactic acid fermentation, which produced other preserved foods, such as soy sauce. Fermentation was also used in this time period to produce leavened bread. Although the process of fermentation was not fully understood until Louis Pasteur‘s work in 1857, it is still the first use of biotechnology to convert a food source into another form.

Before the time of Charles Darwin‘s work and life, animal and plant scientists had already used selective breeding. Darwin added to that body of work with his scientific observations about the ability of science to change species. These accounts contributed to Darwin’s theory of natural selection.[11]

For thousands of years, humans have used selective breeding to improve production of crops and livestock to use them for food. In selective breeding, organisms with desirable characteristics are mated to produce offspring with the same characteristics. For example, this technique was used with corn to produce the largest and sweetest crops.[12]

In the early twentieth century scientists gained a greater understanding of microbiology and explored ways of manufacturing specific products. In 1917, Chaim Weizmann first used a pure microbiological culture in an industrial process, that of manufacturing corn starch using Clostridium acetobutylicum, to produce acetone, which the United Kingdom desperately needed to manufacture explosives during World War I.[13]

Biotechnology has also led to the development of antibiotics. In 1928, Alexander Fleming discovered the mold Penicillium. His work led to the purification of the antibiotic compound formed by the mold by Howard Florey, Ernst Boris Chain and Norman Heatley – to form what we today know as penicillin. In 1940, penicillin became available for medicinal use to treat bacterial infections in humans.[12]

The field of modern biotechnology is generally thought of as having been born in 1971 when Paul Berg’s (Stanford) experiments in gene splicing had early success. Herbert W. Boyer (Univ. Calif. at San Francisco) and Stanley N. Cohen (Stanford) significantly advanced the new technology in 1972 by transferring genetic material into a bacterium, such that the imported material would be reproduced. The commercial viability of a biotechnology industry was significantly expanded on June 16, 1980, when the United States Supreme Court ruled that a genetically modified microorganism could be patented in the case of Diamond v. Chakrabarty.[14] Indian-born Ananda Chakrabarty, working for General Electric, had modified a bacterium (of the genus Pseudomonas) capable of breaking down crude oil, which he proposed to use in treating oil spills. (Chakrabarty’s work did not involve gene manipulation but rather the transfer of entire organelles between strains of the Pseudomonas bacterium.

Revenue in the industry is expected to grow by 12.9% in 2008.

This section needs to be updated. Please update this article to reflect recent events or newly available information. (October 2018)

Another factor influencing the biotechnology sector’s success is improved intellectual property rights legislation—and enforcement—worldwide, as well as strengthened demand for medical and pharmaceutical products to cope with an ageing, and ailing, U.S. population.[15]

Rising demand for biofuels is expected to be good news for the biotechnology sector, with the Department of Energy estimating ethanol usage could reduce U.S. petroleum-derived fuel consumption by up to 30% by 2030. The biotechnology sector has allowed the U.S. farming industry to rapidly increase its supply of corn and soybeans—the main inputs into biofuels—by developing genetically modified seeds that resist pests and drought. By increasing farm productivity, biotechnology boosts biofuel production.[16]

Examples

A rose plant that began as cells grown in a tissue culture

Biotechnology has applications in four major industrial areas, including health care (medical), crop production and agriculture, non-food (industrial) uses of crops and other products (e.g. biodegradable plastics, vegetable oil, biofuels, and environmental uses).

For example, one application of biotechnology is the directed use of microorganisms for the manufacture of organic products (examples include beer and milk products). Another example is using naturally present bacteria by the mining industry in bioleaching. Biotechnology is also used to recycle, treat waste, clean up sites contaminated by industrial activities (bioremediation), and also to produce biological weapons.

A series of derived terms have been coined to identify several branches of biotechnology, for example:

  • Bioinformatics (also called “gold biotechnology”) is an interdisciplinary field that addresses biological problems using computational techniques, and makes the rapid organization as well as analysis of biological data possible. The field may also be referred to as computational biology, and can be defined as, “conceptualizing biology in terms of molecules and then applying informatics techniques to understand and organize the information associated with these molecules, on a large scale.”[17] Bioinformatics plays a key role in various areas, such as functional genomics, structural genomics, and proteomics, and forms a key component in the biotechnology and pharmaceutical sector.[18]
  • Blue biotechnology is based on the exploitation of sea resources to create products and industrial applications.[19] This branch of biotechnology is the most used for the industries of refining and combustion principally on the production of bio-oils with photosynthetic micro-algae.[19][20]
  • Green biotechnology is biotechnology applied to agricultural processes. An example would be the selection and domestication of plants via micropropagation. Another example is the designing of transgenic plants to grow under specific environments in the presence (or absence) of chemicals. One hope is that green biotechnology might produce more environmentally friendly solutions than traditional industrial agriculture. An example of this is the engineering of a plant to express a pesticide, thereby ending the need of external application of pesticides. An example of this would be Bt corn. Whether or not green biotechnology products such as this are ultimately more environmentally friendly is a topic of considerable debate.[19] It is commonly considered as the next phase of green revolution, which can be seen as a platform to eradicate world hunger by using technologies which enable the production of more fertile and resistant, towards biotic and abiotic stress, plants and ensures application of environmentally friendly fertilizers and the use of biopesticides, it is mainly focused on the development of agriculture.[19] On the other hand, some of the uses of green biotechnology involve microorganisms to clean and reduce waste.[21][19]
  • Red biotechnology is the use of biotechnology in the medical and pharmaceutical industries, and health preservation.[19] This branch involves the production of vaccines and antibiotics, regenerative therapies, creation of artificial organs and new diagnostics of diseases.[19] As well as the development of hormones, stem cells, antibodies, siRNA and diagnostic tests.[19]
  • White biotechnology, also known as industrial biotechnology, is biotechnology applied to industrial processes. An example is the designing of an organism to produce a useful chemical. Another example is the using of enzymes as industrial catalysts to either produce valuable chemicals or destroy hazardous/polluting chemicals. White biotechnology tends to consume less in resources than traditional processes used to produce industrial goods.[22][23]
  • “Yellow biotechnology” refers to the use of biotechnology in food production, for example in making wine, cheese, and beer by fermentation.[19] It has also been used to refer to biotechnology applied to insects. This includes biotechnology-based approaches for the control of harmful insects, the characterisation and utilisation of active ingredients or genes of insects for research, or application in agriculture and medicine and various other approaches.[24]
  • Gray biotechnology is dedicated to environmental applications, and focused on the maintenance of biodiversity and the remotion of pollutants.[19]
  • Brown biotechnology is related to the management of arid lands and deserts. One application is the creation of enhanced seeds that resist extreme environmental conditions of arid regions, which is related to the innovation, creation of agriculture techniques and management of resources.[19]
  • Violet biotechnology is related to law, ethical and philosophical issues around biotechnology.[19]
  • Dark biotechnology is the color associated with bioterrorism or biological weapons and biowarfare which uses microorganisms, and toxins to cause diseases and death in humans, livestock and crops.[25][19]

Medicine

In medicine, modern biotechnology has many applications in areas such as pharmaceutical drug discoveries and production, pharmacogenomics, and genetic testing (or genetic screening).

DNA microarray chip – some can do as many as a million blood tests at once

Pharmacogenomics (a combination of pharmacology and genomics) is the technology that analyses how genetic makeup affects an individual’s response to drugs.[26] Researchers in the field investigate the influence of genetic variation on drug responses in patients by correlating gene expression or single-nucleotide polymorphisms with a drug’s efficacy or toxicity.[27] The purpose of pharmacogenomics is to develop rational means to optimize drug therapy, with respect to the patients’ genotype, to ensure maximum efficacy with minimal adverse effects.[28] Such approaches promise the advent of “personalized medicine“; in which drugs and drug combinations are optimized for each individual’s unique genetic makeup.[29][30]

Computer-generated image of insulin hexamers highlighting the threefold symmetry, the zinc ions holding it together, and the histidine residues involved in zinc binding.

Biotechnology has contributed to the discovery and manufacturing of traditional small molecule pharmaceutical drugs as well as drugs that are the product of biotechnology – biopharmaceutics. Modern biotechnology can be used to manufacture existing medicines relatively easily and cheaply. The first genetically engineered products were medicines designed to treat human diseases. To cite one example, in 1978 Genentech developed synthetic humanized insulin by joining its gene with a plasmid vector inserted into the bacterium Escherichia coli. Insulin, widely used for the treatment of diabetes, was previously extracted from the pancreas of abattoir animals (cattle or pigs). The genetically engineered bacteria are able to produce large quantities of synthetic human insulin at relatively low cost.[31][32] Biotechnology has also enabled emerging therapeutics like gene therapy. The application of biotechnology to basic science (for example through the Human Genome Project) has also dramatically improved our understanding of biology and as our scientific knowledge of normal and disease biology has increased, our ability to develop new medicines to treat previously untreatable diseases has increased as well.[32]

Genetic testing allows the genetic diagnosis of vulnerabilities to inherited diseases, and can also be used to determine a child’s parentage (genetic mother and father) or in general a person’s ancestry. In addition to studying chromosomes to the level of individual genes, genetic testing in a broader sense includes biochemical tests for the possible presence of genetic diseases, or mutant forms of genes associated with increased risk of developing genetic disorders. Genetic testing identifies changes in chromosomes, genes, or proteins.[33] Most of the time, testing is used to find changes that are associated with inherited disorders. The results of a genetic test can confirm or rule out a suspected genetic condition or help determine a person’s chance of developing or passing on a genetic disorder. As of 2011 several hundred genetic tests were in use.[34][35] Since genetic testing may open up ethical or psychological problems, genetic testing is often accompanied by genetic counseling.

Agriculture

Genetically modified crops (“GM crops”, or “biotech crops”) are plants used in agriculture, the DNA of which has been modified with genetic engineering techniques. In most cases, the main aim is to introduce a new trait that does not occur naturally in the species. Biotechnology firms can contribute to future food security by improving the nutrition and viability of urban agriculture. Furthermore, the protection of intellectual property rights encourages private sector investment in agrobiotechnology. For example, in Illinois FARM Illinois (Food and Agriculture RoadMap for Illinois) is an initiative to develop and coordinate farmers, industry, research institutions, government, and nonprofits in pursuit of food and agriculture innovation. In addition, the Illinois Biotechnology Industry Organization (iBIO) is a life sciences industry association with more than 500 life sciences companies, universities, academic institutions, service providers and others as members. The association describes its members as “dedicated to making Illinois and the surrounding Midwest one of the world’s top life sciences centers.”[36]

Examples in food crops include resistance to certain pests,[37] diseases,[38] stressful environmental conditions,[39] resistance to chemical treatments (e.g. resistance to a herbicide[40]), reduction of spoilage,[41] or improving the nutrient profile of the crop.[42] Examples in non-food crops include production of pharmaceutical agents,[43] biofuels,[44] and other industrially useful goods,[45] as well as for bioremediation.[46][47]

Farmers have widely adopted GM technology. Between 1996 and 2011, the total surface area of land cultivated with GM crops had increased by a factor of 94, from 17,000 square kilometers (4,200,000 acres) to 1,600,000 km2 (395 million acres).[48] 10% of the world’s crop lands were planted with GM crops in 2010.[48] As of 2011, 11 different transgenic crops were grown commercially on 395 million acres (160 million hectares) in 29 countries such as the US, Brazil, Argentina, India, Canada, China, Paraguay, Pakistan, South Africa, Uruguay, Bolivia, Australia, Philippines, Myanmar, Burkina Faso, Mexico and Spain.[48]

Genetically modified foods are foods produced from organisms that have had specific changes introduced into their DNA with the methods of genetic engineering. These techniques have allowed for the introduction of new crop traits as well as a far greater control over a food’s genetic structure than previously afforded by methods such as selective breeding and mutation breeding.[49] Commercial sale of genetically modified foods began in 1994, when Calgene first marketed its Flavr Savr delayed ripening tomato.[50] To date most genetic modification of foods have primarily focused on cash crops in high demand by farmers such as soybean, corn, canola, and cotton seed oil. These have been engineered for resistance to pathogens and herbicides and better nutrient profiles. GM livestock have also been experimentally developed; in November 2013 none were available on the market,[51] but in 2015 the FDA approved the first GM salmon for commercial production and consumption.[52]

There is a scientific consensus[53][54][55][56][57][58][59] that currently available food derived from GM crops poses no greater risk to human health than conventional food,[60][61][62][63][64][65][66] but that each GM food must be tested on a case-by-case basis before introduction.[67][68][69] Nonetheless, members of the public are much less likely than scientists to perceive GM foods as safe.[70][71][72][73] The legal and regulatory status of GM foods varies by country, with some nations banning or restricting them, and others permitting them with widely differing degrees of regulation.[74][75][76][77]

GM crops also provide a number of ecological benefits, if not used in excess.[78] However, opponents have objected to GM crops per se on several grounds, including environmental concerns, whether food produced from GM crops is safe, whether GM crops are needed to address the world’s food needs, and economic concerns raised by the fact these organisms are subject to intellectual property law.

Industrial

Industrial biotechnology (known mainly in Europe as white biotechnology) is the application of biotechnology for industrial purposes, including industrial fermentation. It includes the practice of using cells such as microorganisms, or components of cells like enzymes, to generate industrially useful products in sectors such as chemicals, food and feed, detergents, paper and pulp, textiles and biofuels.[79] In the current decades, significant progress has been done in creating genetically modified organisms (GMOs) that enhance the diversity of applications and economical viability of industrial biotechnology. By using renewable raw materials to produce a variety of chemicals and fuels, industrial biotechnology is actively advancing towards lowering greenhouse gas emissions and moving away from a petrochemical-based economy.[80]

Environmental

The environment can be affected by biotechnologies, both positively and adversely. Vallero and others have argued that the difference between beneficial biotechnology (e.g.bioremediation is to clean up an oil spill or hazard chemical leak) versus the adverse effects stemming from biotechnological enterprises (e.g. flow of genetic material from transgenic organisms into wild strains) can be seen as applications and implications, respectively.[81] Cleaning up environmental wastes is an example of an application of environmental biotechnology; whereas loss of biodiversity or loss of containment of a harmful microbe are examples of environmental implications of biotechnology.

Regulation

Main articles: Regulation of genetic engineering and Regulation of the release of genetic modified organisms

The regulation of genetic engineering concerns approaches taken by governments to assess and manage the risks associated with the use of genetic engineering technology, and the development and release of genetically modified organisms (GMO), including genetically modified crops and genetically modified fish. There are differences in the regulation of GMOs between countries, with some of the most marked differences occurring between the USA and Europe.[82] Regulation varies in a given country depending on the intended use of the products of the genetic engineering. For example, a crop not intended for food use is generally not reviewed by authorities responsible for food safety.[83] The European Union differentiates between approval for cultivation within the EU and approval for import and processing. While only a few GMOs have been approved for cultivation in the EU a number of GMOs have been approved for import and processing.[84] The cultivation of GMOs has triggered a debate about coexistence of GM and non GM crops. Depending on the coexistence regulations, incentives for cultivation of GM crops differ.[85]

Learning

In 1988, after prompting from the United States Congress, the National Institute of General Medical Sciences (National Institutes of Health) (NIGMS) instituted a funding mechanism for biotechnology training. Universities nationwide compete for these funds to establish Biotechnology Training Programs (BTPs). Each successful application is generally funded for five years then must be competitively renewed. Graduate students in turn compete for acceptance into a BTP; if accepted, then stipend, tuition and health insurance support is provided for two or three years during the course of their Ph.D. thesis work. Nineteen institutions offer NIGMS supported BTPs.[86] Biotechnology training is also offered at the undergraduate level and in community colleges.

See also

References and notes

Text of the CBD. CBD.int. Retrieved on March 20, 2013. “Incorporating Biotechnology into the Classroom What is Biotechnology?”, from the curricula of the ‘Incorporating Biotechnology into the High School Classroom through Arizona State University’s BioREACH program’, accessed on October 16, 2012). Public.asu.edu. Retrieved on March 20, 2013. BiotechnologyArchived November 7, 2012, at the Wayback Machine. Portal.acs.org. Retrieved on March 20, 2013. “Archived copy” (PDF). Archived from the original (PDF) on August 7, 2015. Retrieved December 29, 2014. What is biotechnology?. Europabio. Retrieved on March 20, 2013. Key Biotechnology Indicators (December 2011). oecd.org Biotechnology policies – Organization for Economic Co-operation and Development. Oecd.org. Retrieved on March 20, 2013. “History, scope and development of biotechnology”. iopscience.iop.org. Retrieved October 30, 2018. What Is Bioengineering?Archived January 23, 2013, at the Wayback Machine. Bionewsonline.com. Retrieved on March 20, 2013. See Arnold JP (2005). Origin and History of Beer and Brewing: From Prehistoric Times to the Beginning of Brewing Science and Technology. Cleveland, Ohio: BeerBooks. p. 34. ISBN978-0-9662084-1-2. OCLC71834130.. Cole-Turner R (2003). “Biotechnology”. Encyclopedia of Science and Religion. Retrieved December 7, 2014. Thieman WJ, Palladino MA (2008). Introduction to Biotechnology. Pearson/Benjamin Cummings. ISBN978-0-321-49145-9. Springham D, Springham G, Moses V, Cape RE (1999). Biotechnology: The Science and the Business. CRC Press. p. 1. ISBN978-90-5702-407-8. “Diamond v. Chakrabarty, 447 U.S. 303 (1980). No. 79-139.” United States Supreme Court. June 16, 1980. Retrieved on May 4, 2007. VoIP Providers And Corn Farmers Can Expect To Have Bumper Years In 2008 And Beyond, According To The Latest Research Released By Business Information Analysts At IBISWorld. Los Angeles (March 19, 2008) The Recession List — Top 10 Industries to Fly and Fl… (ith anincreasing share accounted for by …), bio-medicine.org Gerstein, M. “Bioinformatics IntroductionArchived 2007-06-16 at the Wayback Machine.” Yale University. Retrieved on May 8, 2007. Siam, R. (2009). Biotechnology Research and Development in Academia: providing the foundation for Egypt’s Biotechnology spectrum of colors. Sixteenth Annual American University in Cairo Research Conference, American University in Cairo, Cairo, Egypt. BMC Proceedings, 31–35. Kafarski, P. (2012). Rainbow Code of Biotechnology. CHEMIK. Wroclaw University Biotech: true colours. (2009). TCE: The Chemical Engineer, (816), 26–31. Aldridge, S. (2009). The four colours of biotechnology: the biotechnology sector is occasionally described as a rainbow, with each sub sector having its own colour. But what do the different colours of biotechnology have to offer the pharmaceutical industry?. Pharmaceutical Technology Europe, (1). 12. Frazzetto G (September 2003). “White biotechnology”. EMBO Reports. 4 (9): 835–7. doi:10.1038/sj.embor.embor928. PMC1326365. PMID12949582. Frazzetto, G. (2003). White biotechnology. 21/03/2017, de EMBOpress Sitio Advances in Biochemical Engineering/Biotechnology, Volume 135 2013, Yellow Biotechnology I Edgar, J.D. (2004). The Colours of Biotechnology: Science, Development and Humankind. Electronic Journal of Biotechnology, (3), 01 Ermak G. (2013) Modern Science & Future Medicine (second edition) Wang L (2010). “Pharmacogenomics: a systems approach”. Wiley Interdisciplinary Reviews: Systems Biology and Medicine. 2 (1): 3–22. doi:10.1002/wsbm.42. PMC3894835. PMID20836007. Becquemont L (June 2009). “Pharmacogenomics of adverse drug reactions: practical applications and perspectives”. Pharmacogenomics. 10 (6): 961–9. doi:10.2217/pgs.09.37. PMID19530963. “Guidance for Industry Pharmacogenomic Data Submissions” (PDF). U.S. Food and Drug Administration. March 2005. Retrieved August 27, 2008. Squassina A, Manchia M, Manolopoulos VG, Artac M, Lappa-Manakou C, Karkabouna S, Mitropoulos K, Del Zompo M, Patrinos GP (August 2010). “Realities and expectations of pharmacogenomics and personalized medicine: impact of translating genetic knowledge into clinical practice”. Pharmacogenomics. 11 (8): 1149–67. doi:10.2217/pgs.10.97. PMID20712531. Bains W (1987). Genetic Engineering For Almost Everybody: What Does It Do? What Will It Do?. Penguin. p. 99. ISBN978-0-14-013501-5. U.S. Department of State International Information Programs, “Frequently Asked Questions About Biotechnology”, USIS Online; available from USinfo.state.govArchived September 12, 2007, at the Wayback Machine, accessed September 13, 2007. Cf. Feldbaum C (February 2002). “Biotechnology. Some history should be repeated”. Science. 295 (5557): 975. doi:10.1126/science.1069614. PMID11834802. “What is genetic testing? – Genetics Home Reference”. Ghr.nlm.nih.gov. May 30, 2011. Retrieved June 7, 2011. “Genetic Testing: MedlinePlus”. Nlm.nih.gov. Retrieved June 7, 2011. “Definitions of Genetic Testing”. Definitions of Genetic Testing (Jorge Sequeiros and Bárbara Guimarães). EuroGentest Network of Excellence Project. September 11, 2008. Archived from the original on February 4, 2009. Retrieved August 10, 2008. Mazany, Terry (May 19, 2015). “A FOOD AND AGRICULTURE ROADMAP FOR ILLINOIS” (PDF). learnbioscience.com/blog. Genetically Altered Potato Ok’d For Crops Lawrence Journal-World – May 6, 1995 National Academy of Sciences (2001). Transgenic Plants and World Agriculture. Washington: National Academy Press. Paarlburg R (January 2011). “Drought Tolerant GMO Maize in Africa, Anticipating Regulatory Hurdles” (PDF). International Life Sciences Institute. Archived from the original (PDF) on December 22, 2014. Retrieved April 25, 2011. Carpenter J. & Gianessi L. (1999). Herbicide tolerant soybeans: Why growers are adopting Roundup Ready varieties. AgBioForum, 2(2), 65–72. Haroldsen VM, Paulino G, Chi-ham C, Bennett AB (2012). “Research and adoption of biotechnology strategies could improve California fruit and nut crops” (PDF). California Agriculture. 66 (2): 62–69. doi:10.3733/ca.v066n02p62. Archived from the original (PDF) on May 11, 2013. About Golden RiceArchived November 2, 2012, at the Wayback Machine. Irri.org. Retrieved on March 20, 2013. Gali Weinreb and Koby Yeshayahou for Globes May 2, 2012. FDA approves Protalix Gaucher treatmentArchived May 29, 2013, at the Wayback Machine Carrington, Damien (January 19, 2012) GM microbe breakthrough paves way for large-scale seaweed farming for biofuels The Guardian. Retrieved March 12, 2012 van Beilen JB, Poirier Y (May 2008). “Production of renewable polymers from crop plants”. The Plant Journal. 54 (4): 684–701. doi:10.1111/j.1365-313X.2008.03431.x. PMID18476872. Strange, Amy (September 20, 2011) Scientists engineer plants to eat toxic pollution The Irish Times. Retrieved September 20, 2011 Diaz E (editor). (2008). Microbial Biodegradation: Genomics and Molecular Biology (1st ed.). Caister Academic Press. ISBN978-1-904455-17-2. James C (2011). “ISAAA Brief 43, Global Status of Commercialized Biotech/GM Crops: 2011”. ISAAA Briefs. Ithaca, New York: International Service for the Acquisition of Agri-biotech Applications (ISAAA). Retrieved June 2, 2012. GM Science Review First ReportArchived October 16, 2013, at the Wayback Machine, Prepared by the UK GM Science Review panel (July 2003). Chairman Professor Sir David King, Chief Scientific Advisor to the UK Government, P 9 James C (1996). “Global Review of the Field Testing and Commercialization of Transgenic Plants: 1986 to 1995” (PDF). The International Service for the Acquisition of Agri-biotech Applications. Retrieved July 17, 2010. “Consumer Q&A”. Fda.gov. March 6, 2009. Retrieved December 29, 2012. “AquAdvantage Salmon”. FDA. Retrieved July 20, 2018. Nicolia A, Manzo A, Veronesi F, Rosellini D (March 2014). “An overview of the last 10 years of genetically engineered crop safety research” (PDF). Critical Reviews in Biotechnology. 34 (1): 77–88. doi:10.3109/07388551.2013.823595. PMID24041244. Archived from the original (PDF) on September 17, 2016. Retrieved July 8, 2016. “State of Food and Agriculture 2003–2004. Agricultural Biotechnology: Meeting the Needs of the Poor. Health and environmental impacts of transgenic crops”. Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations. Retrieved February 8, 2016. Ronald P (May 2011). “Plant genetics, sustainable agriculture and global food security”. Genetics. 188 (1): 11–20. doi:10.1534/genetics.111.128553. PMC3120150. PMID21546547. Domingo JL, Giné Bordonaba J (May 2011). “A literature review on the safety assessment of genetically modified plants”. Environment International. 37 (4): 734–42. doi:10.1016/j.envint.2011.01.003. PMID21296423. Krimsky S (2015). “An Illusory Consensus behind GMO Health Assessment” (PDF). Science, Technology, & Human Values. 40 (6): 883–914. doi:10.1177/0162243915598381. Archived from the original (PDF) on February 7, 2016. Retrieved July 8, 2016. I began this article with the testimonials from respected scientists that there is literally no scientific controversy over the health effects of GMOs. My investigation into the scientific literature tells another story. Panchin AY, Tuzhikov AI (March 2017). “Published GMO studies find no evidence of harm when corrected for multiple comparisons”. Critical Reviews in Biotechnology. 37 (2): 213–217. doi:10.3109/07388551.2015.1130684. PMID26767435. Yang YT, Chen B (April 2016). “Governing GMOs in the USA: science, law and public health”. Journal of the Science of Food and Agriculture. 96 (6): 1851–5. doi:10.1002/jsfa.7523. PMID26536836. “Statement by the AAAS Board of Directors On Labeling of Genetically Modified Foods” (PDF). American Association for the Advancement of Science. October 20, 2012. Retrieved February 8, 2016. Pinholster G (October 25, 2012). “AAAS Board of Directors: Legally Mandating GM Food Labels Could “Mislead and Falsely Alarm Consumers””. American Association for the Advancement of Science. Retrieved February 8, 2016. A decade of EU-funded GMO research (2001–2010) (PDF). Directorate-General for Research and Innovation. Biotechnologies, Agriculture, Food. European Commission, European Union. 2010. doi:10.2777/97784. ISBN978-92-79-16344-9. Retrieved February 8, 2016. “AMA Report on Genetically Modified Crops and Foods (online summary)”. American Medical Association. January 2001. Retrieved March 19, 2016. “Report 2 of the Council on Science and Public Health (A-12): Labeling of Bioengineered Foods” (PDF). American Medical Association. 2012. Archived from the original on September 7, 2012. Retrieved March 19, 2016. “Restrictions on Genetically Modified Organisms: United States. Public and Scholarly Opinion”. Library of Congress. June 9, 2015. Retrieved February 8, 2016. Genetically Engineered Crops: Experiences and Prospects. The National Academies of Sciences, Engineering, and Medicine (US). 2016. p. 149. Retrieved May 19, 2016. “Frequently asked questions on genetically modified foods”. World Health Organization. Retrieved February 8, 2016. Haslberger AG (July 2003). “Codex guidelines for GM foods include the analysis of unintended effects”. Nature Biotechnology. 21 (7): 739–41. doi:10.1038/nbt0703-739. PMID12833088. Some medical organizations, including the British Medical Association, advocate further caution based upon the precautionary principle:

“Genetically modified foods and health: a second interim statement” (PDF). British Medical Association. March 2004. Retrieved March 21, 2016. Funk C, Rainie L (January 29, 2015). “Public and Scientists’ Views on Science and Society”. Pew Research Center. Retrieved February 24, 2016. The largest differences between the public and the AAAS scientists are found in beliefs about the safety of eating genetically modified (GM) foods. Nearly nine-in-ten (88%) scientists say it is generally safe to eat GM foods compared with 37% of the general public, a difference of 51 percentage points. Marris C (July 2001). “Public views on GMOs: deconstructing the myths. Stakeholders in the GMO debate often describe public opinion as irrational. But do they really understand the public?”. EMBO Reports. 2 (7): 545–8. doi:10.1093/embo-reports/kve142. PMC1083956. PMID11463731. Final Report of the PABE research project (December 2001). “Public Perceptions of Agricultural Biotechnologies in Europe”. Commission of European Communities. Retrieved February 24, 2016. Scott SE, Inbar Y, Rozin P (May 2016). “Evidence for Absolute Moral Opposition to Genetically Modified Food in the United States” (PDF). Perspectives on Psychological Science. 11 (3): 315–24. doi:10.1177/1745691615621275. PMID27217243. “Restrictions on Genetically Modified Organisms”. Library of Congress. June 9, 2015. Retrieved February 24, 2016. Bashshur R (February 2013). “FDA and Regulation of GMOs”. American Bar Association. Retrieved February 24, 2016. Sifferlin A (October 3, 2015). “Over Half of E.U. Countries Are Opting Out of GMOs”. Time. Lynch D, Vogel D (April 5, 2001). “The Regulation of GMOs in Europe and the United States: A Case-Study of Contemporary European Regulatory Politics”. Council on Foreign Relations. Retrieved February 24, 2016. Pollack A (April 13, 2010). “Study Says Overuse Threatens Gains From Modified Crops”. New York Times. Industrial Biotechnology and Biomass UtilisationArchived April 5, 2013, at the Wayback MachineIndustrial biotechnology, A powerful, innovative technology to mitigate climate changeDaniel A. Vallero, Environmental Biotechnology: A Biosystems Approach, Academic Press, Amsterdam, NV; ISBN978-0-12-375089-1; 2010. Gaskell G, Bauer MW, Durant J, Allum NC (July 1999). “Worlds apart? The reception of genetically modified foods in Europe and the U.S”. Science. 285 (5426): 384–7. doi:10.1126/science.285.5426.384. PMID10411496. “The History and Future of GM Potatoes”. Potato Pro. March 10, 2010. Wesseler J, Kalaitzandonakes N (2011). “Present and Future EU GMO policy”. In Oskam A, Meesters G, Silvis H (eds.). EU Policy for Agriculture, Food and Rural Areas (2nd ed.). Wageningen: Wageningen Academic Publishers. pp. 23–332. Beckmann VC, Soregaroli J, Wesseler J (2011). “Coexistence of genetically modified (GM) and non-modified (non GM) crops: Are the two main property rights regimes equivalent with respect to the coexistence value?”. In Carter C, Moschini G, Sheldon I (eds.). Genetically modified food and global welfare. Frontiers of Economics and Globalization Series. 10. Bingley, UK: Emerald Group Publishing. pp. 201–224.

  1. “Biotechnology Predoctoral Training Program”. National Institute of General Medical Sciences. December 18, 2013. Retrieved October 28, 2014.

Further reading

External links

Wikibooks has a book on the topic of: Genes, Technology and Policy
At Wikiversity, you can learn more and teach others about Biotechnology at the Department of Biotechnology
Look up biotechnology in Wiktionary, the free dictionary.
vteBiotechnology
vteTopics related to biology
Authority control GND: 4069491-4 HDS: 26223 LCCN: sh85014263 NDL: 00570270

Categories:

Navigation menu

Search

Interaction

Tools

In other projects

Print/export

Languages

Edit links

vteTopics related to biology
Authority control GND: 4069491-4 HDS: 26223 LCCN: sh85014263 NDL: 00570270

Categories:

Navigation menu

Search

Interaction

Tools

In other projects

Print/export

Languages

Edit links

Skip to content

Travel Oregon Primary Menu

: Hallmark Inn in Newport Plan Your TripPlaces to Stay

Places to Stay

Looking for a hotel, a bed and breakfast, a campground or a treehouse?

Now that you’ve planned the perfect trip, let us help you find the perfect pillow. And maybe a spectacular view too. Bed & Breakfasts Boutique Hotels Campgrounds Farm & Ranch Stays Glamping and Treehouses Hotels & Motels Hostels Resorts RV Parks Vacation Rentals

Trip Ideas

More Trip Ideas

Romantic Escapes

6 Romantic Small Towns in Oregon Government Camp, Mt. Hood & Columbia River Gorge Romantic Getaways in the Willamette Valley Willamette Valley Rejuvenating Escapes to the Banana Belt Bandon, Oregon Coast Luxury Getaways in Central Oregon Bend, Central Oregon Sisters Country for Two Sisters, Central Oregon Romantic Escape to Seaside Seaside, Oregon Coast Advertisements

FEATURED LISTINGS

Sponsored Lithia Springs Resort Ashland, Southern Oregon Wolf Creek Inn Wolf Creek, Southern Oregon Village Green Resort & Gardens Cottage Grove, Willamette Valley Inn at Northrup Station Portland, Portland Region

Unique Getaways

Glamping in Central Oregon Bend, Central Oregon The Magic of Fire Lookouts Government Camp, Mt. Hood & Columbia River Gorge Snow Glamping at Wallowa Alpine Huts Enterprise, Eastern Oregon Girlfriends’ Weekend in Oregon Wine Country Willamette Valley

8 Random Overnights

See More Hampton Inn & Suites Grants Pass Grants Pass, Southern Oregon Motel 6 Bend Bend, Central Oregon Townhouse Motel Klamath Falls, Southern Oregon Oak Park Motel & RV Park Gates, Willamette Valley Shilo Inn Portland Rose Garden Portland, Portland Region Frenchglen Hotel Frenchglen, Eastern Oregon Best Western Dallas Inn & Suites Dallas, Willamette Valley Westlake Resort Westlake/Dunes City, Oregon Coast

See More

Places to Stay

Map

Ask Oregon

Can we stay close to Crater Lake in an RV in October?

I think October is an ideal month to visit Crater Lake! The two campgrounds within the national park are only open during the summer, but there are several wonderful campgrounds located on Highway 62 between Prospect and the park, plus Diamond Lake, located just northwest. I suggest Natural Bridge Campground or one of the others…More

Amy Whitley Southern Oregon Expert Ready to hit the road? Bring our travel magazine along. Free Travel Guides Let’s keep in touch. We have a lot of ideas for you. Email Newsletters

About

Travel Industry

Explore

Partners

©2019 Travel Oregon | The official guide to Oregon travel and tourism information. To contact us, call 1-800-547-7842 or email info@traveloregon.com

Skip to content

Travel Oregon Primary Menu

: Justin Bailie Things To DoOutdoor RecreationCampingHow to Camp Like a Pro

How to Camp Like a Pro

Jen Anderson,  Author July 8, 2019

Ahh — long nights of stargazing, snack foods and wanderlust explorations. Camping is a rite of passage in Oregon, no matter if it’s your first time or 50th. Even for the most seasoned outdoors enthusiast, there are a few camping insider tips that can help you channel your inner Smokey Bear so your next camping trip is more “Planet Earth,” less “National Lampoon’s Vacation.” Here’s what to consider when planning your next Oregon camping adventure.

Camping stoves are versatile ways to make everything from coffee and dessert to hot dogs and fresh seafood in your outdoor kitchen. By Connor Bennett / Alamy Stock Photo

Advertisements

No campfire, no problem

Yes, roasting marshmallows over an open fire is a classic campsite tradition. But in western states, wildfires happen, and campfires are a leading cause. Keep Oregon Green is a statewide nonprofit that’s been working since 1941 to keep landscapes healthy and prevent human-caused wildfires. They advise campers to always check the conditions before heading out between June and October, since weather and wind conditions may prompt campfire restrictions or bans at your location. 

How will you know if there are fire restrictions where you are looking to camp? Always check in with the local agency (U.S. Forest Service, Oregon State Parks or another) to see if there are any restrictions, and plan accordingly. Weather conditions can change quickly, so make sure to check for the latest info at the Oregon Department of Forestry’s handy interactive map.  

If you do go camping during a campfire ban, it means that rather than roasting your marshmallows (and hot dogs) over an open flame, you may get to take your campout to the next level with a camp stove and a tasty s’mores-inspired recipe (sans campfire) to get your fix of a classic outdoor treat.  

 “You can still go to your favorite recreation spot, have that quality family time, go fishing, hiking and trail riding, tell ghost stories in the evening. But when comes time to cooking the meal, use a camp stove instead,” assures Kristin Babbs, president of Keep Oregon Green. Ask an expert at your local outdoor retailer for the best type of camping stove for your needs.

Glamping calls for eating good food outside — the simpler the better — over a cooking stove if a campfire is not allowed. Courtesy of Finex Cookware

Buckets, shovels and camp stoves for the win

From tents and sleeping pads to lanterns and folding chairs, going camping means packing all sorts of gear and tools. If campfires are permitted at your site, Babbs recommends that campers add two more items to their list: a collapsible shovel and a 3.5-gallon bucket (the small household type, used for car washing and house cleaning).

“I pack a lot of my small camping gear items in that bucket — it’s a very hardy durable travel tote” for everything from food to toys, and the bucket can double as a camp stool, says Babbs. “Empty the bucket, fill it with water, secure it with the lid and it becomes a fire extinguisher. You’ve got the tools you need to drown the embers [with water] when you’re done, stir the coals with the shovel [to make sure it’s all wet, since embers ash and wood debris often maintain heat and embers], drown it again and make sure it’s completely out.” After extinguishing a campfire, the rule of thumb is that “If it’s too hot to touch, it’s too hot to leave.” Keep drowning the embers to cool as many times as needed.

When it comes to meals, one other camping investment that will bring a ton of outdoors cred is a simple camping stove and cookware. Portland-based Finex Cookware makes a great cast-iron pan and Dutch oven — both widely popular for group camping. Check out their inspired, glamping-ready stovetop recipes.

Before you make a beach fire, make sure to read up on all of the rules for proper extinguishing. Keep Oregon Green is an excellent resource. Photo by Justin Bailie

Firewood and building your campfire

Pros know that campfires in Oregon should only be built in existing rings within designated campgrounds. Campfires are typically allowed in these types of sites because there is a fire-safe buffer, free of ignitable vegetation, around the campfire pit.

For beach campfires, there may not be a fire ring but look for open sand, away from driftwood or vegetation. And, again, keep a bucket of water nearby to extinguish the fire. Covering a fire with sand will just insulate the coals and pose a danger to barefoot beachgoers or reignite in windy conditions and potentially start a wildfire.

It’s smart to plan ahead for firewood. The rule of thumb is to buy it where you’ll burn it — in other words, look for the campground host or local on-site store. Firewood can carry insects and disease that can threaten native species, so just like your produce, it’s smart to keep your firewood local to keep the forests healthy.

When building a campfire, remember that this isn’t a bonfire — keep the fire small and contained, add the wood in small amounts, and monitor it at all times. That means it should be out even if you’re just going for a short walk. “What’s at risk for campers is the ability being able to come back and enjoy their favorite camp spot for years to come,” says Babbs. “We all want to keep those areas of our forests green for future generations.”


If you go:

Love the outdoors as much as we do? Check out Oregon’s new Smokey Bear vanity license plates, available at local DMVs as of Aug. 1, 2019 to celebrate the famous bear’s 75th birthday.

Ready to get outside? See How to Book a Last-Minute Camping Trip for inspiration, Oregon Camping 101 for the basics, and What You Need to Know About Wildfires for more trip-planning ideas and important information.

About The Author

Jen Anderson Jen Anderson writes and edits Travel Oregon’s e-newsletters and other online content. She loves finding the latest places to eat, drink and play around the state with her husband and two young boys. Brewpubs, beaches and bike trails top the list.

Trip Ideas

Skip to content

Travel Oregon Primary Menu

: Justin Bailie Things To DoOutdoor RecreationCampingHow to Camp Like a Pro

How to Camp Like a Pro

Jen Anderson,  Author July 8, 2019

Ahh — long nights of stargazing, snack foods and wanderlust explorations. Camping is a rite of passage in Oregon, no matter if it’s your first time or 50th. Even for the most seasoned outdoors enthusiast, there are a few camping insider tips that can help you channel your inner Smokey Bear so your next camping trip is more “Planet Earth,” less “National Lampoon’s Vacation.” Here’s what to consider when planning your next Oregon camping adventure.

Camping stoves are versatile ways to make everything from coffee and dessert to hot dogs and fresh seafood in your outdoor kitchen. By Connor Bennett / Alamy Stock Photo

Advertisements

No campfire, no problem

Yes, roasting marshmallows over an open fire is a classic campsite tradition. But in western states, wildfires happen, and campfires are a leading cause. Keep Oregon Green is a statewide nonprofit that’s been working since 1941 to keep landscapes healthy and prevent human-caused wildfires. They advise campers to always check the conditions before heading out between June and October, since weather and wind conditions may prompt campfire restrictions or bans at your location. 

How will you know if there are fire restrictions where you are looking to camp? Always check in with the local agency (U.S. Forest Service, Oregon State Parks or another) to see if there are any restrictions, and plan accordingly. Weather conditions can change quickly, so make sure to check for the latest info at the Oregon Department of Forestry’s handy interactive map.  

If you do go camping during a campfire ban, it means that rather than roasting your marshmallows (and hot dogs) over an open flame, you may get to take your campout to the next level with a camp stove and a tasty s’mores-inspired recipe (sans campfire) to get your fix of a classic outdoor treat.  

 “You can still go to your favorite recreation spot, have that quality family time, go fishing, hiking and trail riding, tell ghost stories in the evening. But when comes time to cooking the meal, use a camp stove instead,” assures Kristin Babbs, president of Keep Oregon Green. Ask an expert at your local outdoor retailer for the best type of camping stove for your needs.

Glamping calls for eating good food outside — the simpler the better — over a cooking stove if a campfire is not allowed. Courtesy of Finex Cookware

Buckets, shovels and camp stoves for the win

From tents and sleeping pads to lanterns and folding chairs, going camping means packing all sorts of gear and tools. If campfires are permitted at your site, Babbs recommends that campers add two more items to their list: a collapsible shovel and a 3.5-gallon bucket (the small household type, used for car washing and house cleaning).

“I pack a lot of my small camping gear items in that bucket — it’s a very hardy durable travel tote” for everything from food to toys, and the bucket can double as a camp stool, says Babbs. “Empty the bucket, fill it with water, secure it with the lid and it becomes a fire extinguisher. You’ve got the tools you need to drown the embers [with water] when you’re done, stir the coals with the shovel [to make sure it’s all wet, since embers ash and wood debris often maintain heat and embers], drown it again and make sure it’s completely out.” After extinguishing a campfire, the rule of thumb is that “If it’s too hot to touch, it’s too hot to leave.” Keep drowning the embers to cool as many times as needed.

When it comes to meals, one other camping investment that will bring a ton of outdoors cred is a simple camping stove and cookware. Portland-based Finex Cookware makes a great cast-iron pan and Dutch oven — both widely popular for group camping. Check out their inspired, glamping-ready stovetop recipes.

Before you make a beach fire, make sure to read up on all of the rules for proper extinguishing. Keep Oregon Green is an excellent resource. Photo by Justin Bailie

Firewood and building your campfire

Pros know that campfires in Oregon should only be built in existing rings within designated campgrounds. Campfires are typically allowed in these types of sites because there is a fire-safe buffer, free of ignitable vegetation, around the campfire pit.

For beach campfires, there may not be a fire ring but look for open sand, away from driftwood or vegetation. And, again, keep a bucket of water nearby to extinguish the fire. Covering a fire with sand will just insulate the coals and pose a danger to barefoot beachgoers or reignite in windy conditions and potentially start a wildfire.

It’s smart to plan ahead for firewood. The rule of thumb is to buy it where you’ll burn it — in other words, look for the campground host or local on-site store. Firewood can carry insects and disease that can threaten native species, so just like your produce, it’s smart to keep your firewood local to keep the forests healthy.

When building a campfire, remember that this isn’t a bonfire — keep the fire small and contained, add the wood in small amounts, and monitor it at all times. That means it should be out even if you’re just going for a short walk. “What’s at risk for campers is the ability being able to come back and enjoy their favorite camp spot for years to come,” says Babbs. “We all want to keep those areas of our forests green for future generations.”


If you go:

Love the outdoors as much as we do? Check out Oregon’s new Smokey Bear vanity license plates, available at local DMVs as of Aug. 1, 2019 to celebrate the famous bear’s 75th birthday.

Ready to get outside? See How to Book a Last-Minute Camping Trip for inspiration, Oregon Camping 101 for the basics, and What You Need to Know About Wildfires for more trip-planning ideas and important information.

About The Author

Jen Anderson Jen Anderson writes and edits Travel Oregon’s e-newsletters and other online content. She loves finding the latest places to eat, drink and play around the state with her husband and two young boys. Brewpubs, beaches and bike trails top the list.

Trip Ideas

More Trip Ideas

Is any of the information on this page incorrect? Suggest an update Ready to hit the road? Bring our travel magazine along. Free Travel Guides Let’s keep in touch. We have a lot of ideas for you. Email Newsletters

About

Travel Industry

Explore

Partners

©2019 Travel Oregon | The official guide to Oregon travel and tourism information. To contact us, call 1-800-547-7842 or email info@traveloregon.com

More Trip Ideas

Is any of the information on this page incorrect? Suggest an update Ready to hit the road? Bring our travel magazine along. Free Travel Guides Let’s keep in touch. We have a lot of ideas for you. Email Newsletters

About

Travel Industry

Explore

Partners

©2019 Travel Oregon | The official guide to Oregon travel and tourism information. To contact us, call 1-800-547-7842 or email info@traveloregon.com

ove Island (American TV series)
Love Island (stylized as love island and also known as Love Island USA outside of the U.S.,) is an American dating reality show based on the British series
59 KB (1,692 words) – 20:54, 6 August 2019
Love Island (2015 TV series)
Love Island is a British dating reality show. It is a revival of the earlier celebrity series of the same name, which aired for two series in 2005 and
31 KB (2,717 words) – 20:12, 6 August 2019
Temptation Island (TV series)
March 8, 2019. “‘Temptation Island’ Renewed For Season 2 On USA”. KAJAL – Temptation Island Season 1 site Season 2 site Season 3 site USA Network site
11 KB (435 words) – 16:22, 1 August 2019
Big Brother 20 (American season)
promotional video for Love Island which was used in Big Brother 21. Winston Hines also appeared as a contestant on Love Island’s first season. He entered the
146 KB (5,833 words) – 00:55, 5 August 2019
The Love Boat
Greatest Episodes of All Time from TV Guide magazine. The Love Boat ran for nine seasons plus four specials. Another made-for-TV movie, titled The Love Boat:
20 KB (2,176 words) – 16:05, 29 June 2019
List of Mr. Robot episodes
[update] 32 episodes of Mr. Robot have aired, concluding the third season. On December 13, 2017, USA renewed Mr. Robot for a fourth season. In August 2018
78 KB (2,217 words) – 03:33, 4 August 2019
List of White Collar episodes
airing in January 2013. On September 25, 2012, USA Network renewed the series for a 16-episode fifth season, but this was later reduced to 13. It premiered
121 KB (4,085 words) – 17:50, 4 April 2019
The Bachelor (season 20)
half-sister of Ready for Love star Ben Patton. The season traveled to many places including Las Vegas, Nevada, Mexico City, Mexico, Pig Island in The Bahamas and
53 KB (2,162 words) – 15:55, 30 July 2019
Stranger Things (season 1)
limited to a typical 22-episode format, opting for the eight-episode approach. They had been concerned that a 22-episode season on broadcast television
92 KB (6,795 words) – 21:43, 4 August 2019
List of Pokémon: Adventures on the Orange Islands episodes
Pokémon: Adventures on the Orange Islands is the second season of the Pokémon anime series known in Japan as Pocket Monsters (ポケットモンスター, Poketto Monsutā)
35 KB (574 words) – 00:20, 15 July 2019
List of Miami Vice episodes
1989 after five seasons. Though the series concluded on May 21, 1989, NBC aired three more episodes after the series finale, and USA Network aired a fourth
66 KB (930 words) – 00:47, 15 July 2019
List of Elementary episodes
announced that the series would end after the seventh season. As of August 1, 2019,[update] 152 episodes of Elementary have aired. Aired a week earlier in
287 KB (8,759 words) – 01:26, 6 August 2019
List of Royal Pains episodes
airing on January 18, 2012. The series was renewed for a sixteen-episode fourth season by USA Network on September 15, 2011. Campbell Scott and Brooke D’Orsay
112 KB (4,089 words) – 01:23, 4 September 2018
Game of Thrones (season 8)
the first six seasons, which consisted of ten episodes each, and the seventh season, which consisted of seven episodes, the eighth season consists of only
81 KB (5,916 words) – 11:59, 6 August 2019
List of Covert Affairs episodes
that USA had opted to cancel the show. Season one of Covert Affairs comprises eleven episodes. With the exception of the pilot episode, all Season 1 episode
133 KB (3,656 words) – 16:27, 10 February 2019
List of 6teen episodes
Complete First Season, on November 13, 2007; however, the episodes on the DVD are not in the correct order. In the USA, 6teen Season 1 Volume 1, 6teen Dude
63 KB (397 words) – 17:17, 29 April 2019
List of Pokémon: Indigo League episodes
part of Season 2 (and “Beauty and the Beach” of Indigo League aired during Season 2), followed by 25 Adventures on the Orange Islands episodes. Pop also
90 KB (1,412 words) – 00:20, 15 July 2019
List of Total Drama episodes
“Total Drama Island Recap”. However, this episode is not counted as an actual episode in the season. In addition, both Total Drama Island and Total Drama
18 KB (2,762 words) – 10:33, 25 July 2019
List of The Great Food Truck Race episodes
of episodes for the reality television series The Great Food Truck Race on Food Network. On May 13, 2019, it was announced that the tenth season will
144 KB (21,356 words) – 01:00, 4 August 2019
Arielle Vandenberg
in 2017. In June 2019, it was announced that Vandenberg will host Love Island USA, premiering July 2019 on CBS. “How To Impress Me: Arielle Vandenberg”
8 KB (288 words) – 17:48, 8 July 2019